Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

The Case Against Abortion

Sex selection abortions - LNA President article published online.

Life Network Australia - Monday, March 04, 2013

President and co-founder of Life Network Australia, Sonja Couroupis, has written about sex selection abortions in Australia and her piece has been published by Opinion Online. Please leave a comment on the Online Opinion website (see link below) and support Senator Madigan's courageous efforts.

"The reaction to Senator John Madigan preparing a bill, to remove federal funding for sex selection abortions has been telling. The old tricks of the abortion lobby have been dragged out to avoid much needed consideration of the implementation of abortion in Australia – these tricks include undermining men who do not agree with their position (playing the exhausted misogyny card), assuming they represent all women and avoiding the issue at hand – in this case, sex selection.
 
What many don't know is that internationally, millions and millions of baby girls are, in fact, being killed in the womb and after birth…just for being girls!"

 Read more (and add your comment) here:

Federal politicians ignore warning about RU486 - and now a woman has died.

Life Network Australia - Monday, March 19, 2012

Last May (2011), Life Network Australia reported the harm done by the RU486 abortion pill in South Australia, where some 400 women were hospitalised in just one year.

At the time, Dr. Mulligan said that "Australian doctors are on a learning curve" in the use of RU486.  Life Network Australia argued that they were playing with the lives of women and babies.

This article was sent to Nicola Roxon, former Federal Minister for Health and to Peter Dutton, Shadow Minister for Health. However our warnings were ignored and now a woman has died from what The Australian call a "bedroom abortion".

The Australian reports that the Therapeutic Goods Administration has "issued a notice to doctors and clinics to review their follow up care". Life Network Australia continues to argue that abortion does not qualify as "therapeutic" and should be taken out of their hands.

Life Network Australia again calls on Nicola Roxon to suspend access to the RU486 abortion pill - or women (not to mention the babies) will continue to die.

This tragic death follows that of another mother, just before Christmas - and a near fatality just weeks before that in Melbourne. For every baby it is a certain agonising death!

 "Legal, safe and rare"? ...no such thing!

 

Liberal MP speaks out in Vic Parliament in first week of sitting, 2012.

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Victorian Liberal MP, Bernie Finn, has not wasted any time in highlighting the problem of abortion during the first week of Parliamentary sitting (on February 9, 2012). He provided a summary of the research conducted by Dr. Priscilla Coleman - which was recently published in the highly respected British Journal of Psychiatry (August, 2011).

Mr. Finn provided alarming statistics from this study, revealing the psychological risks of abortion to women and has asked the Minister for Mental Health, Mary Wooldridge, to establish post abortion counselling services in Victoria. 

There were no interjections made and Mr Finn said "You could have heard a pin drop! "

Read his address here:

"Mental health: abortion counselling services. 

Mr FINN (Western Metropolitan) — I have a  

matter for the attention of the Minister for Mental

Health. I draw the minister’s attention to an extensive

study by US university professor Priscilla Coleman,

which was published in the prestigious British Journal

of Psychiatry late last year. Professor Coleman

 performed a meta-analysis of 22 studies, which tracked

a total of 877 181 women, 163 831 of whom were post

abortive. This was clearly no small study and the results

were truly illuminating. My understanding is that it is

the largest study of its kind ever conducted in the world.

The results of this study are disturbing, but as I say they

are quite illuminating. The study found that women

with an abortion history experienced 81 per cent

increased risk of mental health problems. It found an

increased risk of anxiety disorders in the order of 34 per

cent, an increased risk of depression of 37 per cent, an

increased risk of alcohol use and abuse of 110 per cent

and an increased risk of marijuana use and abuse of

220 per cent. When compared to unintended

pregnancies that were delivered, women who

terminated had a 55 per cent increased risk of mental

health problems. Alarmingly nearly 10 per cent of all

mental health problems were found to be directly

attributable to abortion. These figures certainly shocked

me and I think they would shock most people,

particularly so when we realise that Australian women

were included in this study.

Given the results of this survey, it is clear that

considerable numbers of women here in Victoria may

be suffering at least some mental health problems

following abortions, particularly since 2008, because

the number of late-term abortions has skyrocketed since

that time following the passing of the Abortion Law

Reform Act 2008, which allows abortion in this state up

until birth. As a result of that, many women may need

assistance. Today I am asking the minister to provide

that assistance. I am convinced that post-abortion

counselling services are much needed in Victoria, and I

ask the minister to facilitate the provision of these

services to ease the burden felt by so many women

following their abortions".

Please support the courageous efforts of Bernie Finn by continuing to contact:

Premier Baillieu: http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/contact.html 

and

Victorian Health Minister, David Davis: http://www.vic.gov.au/contactsandservices/directory/?ea0_lfz99_120.&organizationalRole&b72724f2-1db2-4b9f-b226-7f05e1c8ad54

 

Vic Hansard link: ( http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/daily-hansard/Council_2012/Council_Feb-Jun_2012_Daily_9_February_2012.pdf - pg 75)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Melbourne woman dies from abortion in Croydon, Melbourne a week before Christmas.

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, December 21, 2011

The Age have reported that "A 42-YEAR-OLD woman died days after attending a controversial abortion clinic in Croydon last week".

It goes on to say that "Authorities have confirmed that the woman was taken to the Box Hill Hospital where she died on Sunday, after earlier having ''a procedure at a private Croydon clinic''.

According to the article,  the Coroners Court of Victoria's spokesperson said that "the death of the woman, from Sunshine, would be investigated".

This is the fourth investigation involving this particular clinic in six years.


Life Network Australia has been supporting a campaign for the month of December, following the tragic abortion of 32 week old twin boys. In light of yet another tragedy, we urge you to please email and phone Premier Ted Baillieu and Health Minister David Davis, as well as your local member - to voice your objection to the current Victorian laws that allow these situations to occur.  


1. Call Premier Baillieu (            03 9651 5000      ), the Health Minister, David Davis (            03 9096 8561      ) and your local member.

2. If you have access to a fax machine, please fax at them today

 Premier Baillieu - fax no 03) 9651 5054 and  David Davis fax 03) 9096 3373



Melbourne, what do you know about Vic abortion laws? We ask the people (you tube footage of responses).

Life Network Australia - Thursday, December 08, 2011

Two teenagers hit the streets of Melbourne to find out what people know (...or don't know) about the current abortion laws in Victoria. Check out their responses! 

In part one, Mary and Hayley asked the public "How far into pregnancy is it legal for a mother to abort her baby in Victoria?"

In part two  - They asked "Is parental consent for minors required by law in Victoria?"

Please phone now (and again tomorrow) to express your dissatisfaction with the current abortion laws in Victoria 
Premier Ted Baillieu               (03) 9882 4088       

Email ted.baillieu@parliament.vic.gov.au 

Victorian Health Minister David Davis            03 9096 8561      

Email david.davis@parliament.vic.gov.au   

Harmed by abortion? – Time to respond!

Life Network Australia - Saturday, February 26, 2011

In July 2010, 31-year-old Filipina woman, Rechilda Moll-Sequitin, settled a lawsuit against her employer who allegedly forced her to abort her unborn child. The employer's company denied threatening her with dismissal if she failed to abort, but settled out of court after the court was told that Ms Moll-Sequitin had recorded the threats. (Check out the news report for details)

Pregnant Australian women have more to contend with than coercion in the workplace. Anecdotal evidence suggests that women may be treated just as badly in Australian abortion clinics.

Women’s stories reveal that clinics may not obtain proper consent (“I was really sobbing quite hysterically”), are often uninformed or misinformed (“…it was just a sack of cells”), and are not adequately warned of the physical and psychological risks arising from the abortion procedure. (See Ali’s story)

Up until recently, the courts have been the primary mechanism through which abortion has been made available to Australian women. Now, women coerced or harmed by the abortion industry have the opportunity to use the courts for compensation for their mistreatment.

Abortion Legal Support are a network of independent lawyers in Australia and New Zealand who believe women have a right to access the legal system with their abortion harm claims.

According to their website, ALS’ services include claims against clinics including:
• misleading and deceptive advertising by abortion clinics
• failure to inform of possible depression or other side effects of abortion
• providing little or no information as to development of the unborn child
• not offering an opportunity to view ultrasound imaging
• a counselling process which made a woman feel pressured to have an abortion
• a counselling process which failed to give a woman adequate time to work out their own wishes
• failing to identify that a boyfriend/ partner/ parent or some other person was pressuring a woman to abort.

Australian women deserve freedom from coercion, misinformation and lack of information. Perhaps it is time that those who have been mistreated send this message to the abortion industry – via the courts if necessary.

The Role of Law

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
It is reasonable and necessary for society to outlaw certain ‘choices’. The only way people can successfully live together in community is to give up a measure of personal freedom. Personal choices that infringe on the life or livelihood of another human being must be legislated against. Therefore, it is impossible to justify abortion by simply arguing that women should be ‘free to choose’ (http://www.abort73.com/index.php?/abortion/the_role_of_law)

In Australia, we legislate against driving under the influence of alcohol because of the likelihood for injury or death to another party. We outlaw smoking in public places, even in our own cars (where children are present), because of the potential impact on the health of others. This is because it is not OK to do whatever we want with our bodies when it adversely affects the health of others. The role of law is to curb the freedom of some, to ensure the more basic freedoms of others. 

Is choice a universal right? To be pro choice or anti choice makes no sense. It all depends on the ‘choice’ that we are talking about. It is silly to defend a specific choice on the basis that it is a choice. For example, few people are pro choice about rape, child abuse or cruelty to animals. No one has the ‘right’ to do such things. On the other hand, other choices are regarded as a right – matters of religion, politics and lifestyle, for example. Even poor choices may be permitted. No one will stop you from staying out late before an exam, leaving the milk out or wearing a heavy coat in summer. ‘Choice’ is only a right if it doesn’t harm others.

Opposing abortion is not about opposing the right to choose. It is about opposing the particular choice of abortion, on the grounds that it harms another person – the unborn child. It is reasonable to expect that our Government will restrict the freedom of some, to protect the welfare of others, just as it does in the cases of rape, slavery and assault.


Recent Posts


Tags


Archive