Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

The Case Against Abortion

Vic GP on gender selection - could face sanctions.

Life Network Australia - Monday, April 29, 2013

A courageous Victorian GP, Dr. Mark Hobart, has spoken out against abortion for gender selection purposes, describing his own experience of refusing to refer on those grounds. Read more here .

The public's response has generally been one of disgust that anyone would seek an abortion because they didn't want a girl or boy (see vote poll  and comments following the article here).

Click the image above to see the Letters to the Editor in full size

But now Dr Hobart could face tough sanctions.

According to another Herald Sun article, "Dr Hobart admits he has broken the law and could face suspension, conditions on his ability to practice or even be deregistered. But he was willing to risk punishment in pursuit of principles".

The article also mentions another doctor "who was brought before the Medical Board in January for airing his views against abortion was cautioned and warned he could be deregistered if it happened again".

Christian Agenti host of 'Talking Back the Night' on FM Mix 92.7 spoke with Dr Hobart and got feedback from callers on their views. You can listen here

Dr Hobart was interviewed this morning by Neil Mitchell. You can hear the interview here

It will be very interesting to follow what happens from here - we will keep you posted.

RU486 explained.

Life Network Australia - Monday, September 17, 2012

By Clinton Wilcox

What is RU486?

Most people who are familiar with the abortion issue are familiar with surgical methods of abortion (such as D&E). But what you might not be as familiar with is RU486, which is essentially an abortion in a "convenient" pill. RU486 is also known by its more generic name, Mifepristone. RU486 can be "effective" on its own, but it is usually followed up with a second drug, Prostaglandin, to induce the uterus to contract and expel the shriveled corpse.

A woman is first counseled, given a physical examination and an ultrasound. Once the doctors determines it would not be dangerous or deadly to the woman, she is given the drug to take in the doctor’s presence. Two days later, on a follow-up visit, she is given the Prostaglandin. This results in powerful and painful contractions of the uterus which works to expel the baby. It can take up to two weeks for the RU486/Prostaglandin abortion to fully complete. On another follow-up visit, if the abortion hasn’t been completed by then the doctor will recommend a surgical abortion to complete the aborton.

How does it work?

It is important to note that RU486 is different from the morning after pill. There is some research that suggests the morning after pill may cause an early abortion (by preventing implantation of an already conceived human zygote) [1], but the pill usually works to delay ovulation or prevent the sperm from fertilizing the ovum. [2] This is why it’s called Plan B. If other contraception fails, you take the morning after pill to try and prevent pregnancy. However, if the research is correct and it does have a chance of preventing implantation of a human zygote, then it would be unethical to use (since the zygote is a living human organism). It would essentially be a very early abortion.

RU486 is abortive. Since the woman doesn’t even know she’s pregnant until about the fifth week of pregnancy, RU486 is used from the fifth week of pregnancy until the ninth week (so there’s a five-week window in which it’s effective).

The drug essentially works by shutting down the process of pregnancy, causing the child to suffocate or starve to death and detach from the uterus. She will then be flushed out with the woman’s next menstrual period, along with the decayed uterus lining. It does this by interfering with the action of progesterone, a hormone crucial to the early process of pregnancy. [3]

Progesterone helps suppress uterine contractions which could dislodge the child, as well as stimulates the proliferation of the uterine lining which nourishes the developing child. RU486 fills the chemical receptor sites reserved for progesterone but does not transmit the progesterone signal. Failing to receive the signal, the woman’s body shuts down the preparation of the uterus and initiates the normal menstrual process.

How developed is the child by this time?

Since it is about the fifth week of pregnancy that a woman detects she’s pregnant, that means the unborn child is three weeks old (pregnancy is measured from the last menstrual period, so when a woman is X weeks pregnant, the unborn child is X-2 weeks old since conception is about two weeks after the last menstrual period [4]).

Development in the womb is pretty rapid. Everything is in place by the eighth week of embryonic development (which is the tenth week of pregnancy). So when RU486 can first be used, the preborn human has already developed a beating heart that pumps blood (often a different bloodtype than the mother). She has also started to develop the spinal column, nervous system, brain, liver, kidneys, and intestines. The child is roughly the size of a tip of the pen by the end of this week. [5] This is at the earliest RU486 is used.

If used in the sixth week of pregnancy (fourth week of fetal development), basic facial features have begun to develop, and small buds that will become the arms and legs. Growth becomes rapid at this point. If used in the seventh week (fifth week of fetal development), nostrils form and eye lenses begin to take shape. The arms continue to grow. By the end of this week, the baby might be a little bigger than the top of a pencil eraser.

If used in the eighth week of pregnancy (sixth week of fetal development), the arms are growing longer and fingers develop. The eyes are visible and ears begin to take shape. The upper lip and nose have formed. By the end of this week, the baby is roughly ½ inch long. If taken in the ninth week of pregnancy (seventh week of fetal development), the arms develop bones and bend at the elbows, toes form, eyelids and ears begin developing. By the end of this week, your baby is about ¾ inch long. This is the latest at which RU486 is used (although it begins to lose its effectiveness at seven weeks).

If a woman uses RU486, she ends up expelling the aborted unborn human (now a shriveled corpse) into the toilet when she uses the restroom. She can see what it looks like (though if used earlier it might be too small to make out any features). You might have to look closely at it.

Complications

RU486 is hardly a safe drug. Normal side-effects are prolonged heavy bleeding, severe cramps, nausea, diarrhea, headache, skin rash, and vomiting. [6] The woman usually bleeds for ten days, but it can last up to 43 days. Five women out of a hundred bleed so severely that a D&C is required to stop the bleeding. Some women even have required blood transfusions. [7] There have been two reported heart attacks and one confirmed death. [8] [9] Though death by abortions are sometimes difficult to measure (and RU486 is no different). Complications from abortion usually set in at a later time. The official cause of death will be whatever she died from, though the actual cause of her death was the abortion she had.

 

[1] http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/morning-after-pill/MY01190/DSECTION=why-its-done -- some research suggests this may not be the case. There is no definitive answer as to whether it does or not.
[2] http://health.howstuffworks.com/sexual-health/contraception/morning-after1.htm
[3] André Ulmann, Georges Teutsch, and Daniel Philbert, "RU486," Scientific American, Vol. 262, No. 6 (June 1990), pp. 18-24.
[4] http://www.americanpregnancy.org/weekbyweek/week1_2.htm
[5] http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/prenatal-care/PR00112
[6] Louise Silvestre, et al, “Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy with Mifepristone (RU486) and a Prostaglandin Analogue,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 322, No. 10 (March 8, 1990), pp. 645-648, and E.E. Baulieu, “RU 486 as an Antiprogesterone Steroid,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 262, No. 13, (October 6, 2009), pp. 1808-1814.
[7] Mary W. Rodger and David T. Baird, “Blood Loss Following induction of Early Abortion Using Mifepristone (RU 486) and a Prostaglandin Analogue (Gemeprost),” Contraception, Vol. 40, No. 4 (October 1989), p. 439.
[8] Dr. Y.M. Kervran, “RU 486: Rousell addresse une lettre aux gynecologues des centres d’IVG (RU 486: Rousell Addresses A Letter To Abortion Center Gynecologists),” Le Quotidien Du Medicin (Medical Daily), (April 30, 1990), p. 11.
[9] Martine Laronche, “Les contre-indications de 1’IVG par voie maedicamenteuse pourraient etre elargies (Contraindications for abortion by medication could be expanded),” Le Monde, (April 10, 1991).

Fourteen babies born alive and left to die - W.A.

Life Network Australia - Thursday, May 03, 2012

 

Perth Now has reported that the Western Australian Health Department is investigating the deaths of 14 babies who were born alive after abortion attempts and were left to die.

According to the article, hospital records show that no resuscitation or medical treatment of any kind was provided to these babies, one of whom was over 26 weeks old.

Labor MPs, Kate Doust and Ed Dermer have called for a Parliamentary enquiry into their deaths.

 In response to a petition of 5,000 signatures, submitted by the Coalition for the Defence of Human Life, Health Minister, Kim Hames said the deaths would be investigated. He has said that a baby's attempts to breath after birth "do not necessarily indicate viability".

The article reports that "the committee closed its inquiries into the deaths despite no further correspondence from Dr Hames of the investigation".

Related articles and footage about babies born alive and left to die in Australia:

Queensland - http://www.lifenetwork.org.au/BlogRetrieve.aspx?PostID=49050&A=SearchResult&SearchID=2591914&ObjectID=49050&ObjectType=55

Victoria - http://www.lifenetwork.org.au/BlogRetrieve.aspx?PostID=104954&A=SearchResult&SearchID=2591914&ObjectID=104954&ObjectType=55

Melissa Ohden - abortion attempt survivor and Vic legislation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3WHP7Q5dp8

 

 

  

 

 

Federal politicians ignore warning about RU486 - and now a woman has died.

Life Network Australia - Monday, March 19, 2012

Last May (2011), Life Network Australia reported the harm done by the RU486 abortion pill in South Australia, where some 400 women were hospitalised in just one year.

At the time, Dr. Mulligan said that "Australian doctors are on a learning curve" in the use of RU486.  Life Network Australia argued that they were playing with the lives of women and babies.

This article was sent to Nicola Roxon, former Federal Minister for Health and to Peter Dutton, Shadow Minister for Health. However our warnings were ignored and now a woman has died from what The Australian call a "bedroom abortion".

The Australian reports that the Therapeutic Goods Administration has "issued a notice to doctors and clinics to review their follow up care". Life Network Australia continues to argue that abortion does not qualify as "therapeutic" and should be taken out of their hands.

Life Network Australia again calls on Nicola Roxon to suspend access to the RU486 abortion pill - or women (not to mention the babies) will continue to die.

This tragic death follows that of another mother, just before Christmas - and a near fatality just weeks before that in Melbourne. For every baby it is a certain agonising death!

 "Legal, safe and rare"? ...no such thing!

 

Medic who accidently gave "healthy twin" lethal injection still working at the Royal Women's Hospital.

Life Network Australia - Saturday, March 03, 2012

The Herald Sun (March 1, 2012) have provided an update on the investigation into the abortion of the "wrong twin" last November at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne (see article below).

It has been reported that the medic who "wrongly aborted a healthy twin foetus still works at the Royal Women's Hospital".

An independent report, led by Canberra Hospital's Professor David Ellwood, found that human error was the cause of the mistake.

According to the article, "The Royal Women's will not release the report publicly until it forms part of a government publication expected this year" - we understand that this will not be until November 2012, a full year since the tragic abortion of the twins.

Chief executive of the Australian Patients Association has said that the report should be made public and the association questioned why the findings of the report was being "brushed under the carpet".

As expected, a Royal Women's Hospital spokeswoman said that "there would be no comment on the clinician's work status".

Once again, we would like to know why there appears to be an exception to standard medical protocol and accountability when it comes to abortion and why doesn't the public have the right to know the findings of this initial report?

What happened last November:

The Herald Sun have reported a tragic double abortion of 32 week old twin boys at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne. The first baby was killed as a result of a "bungle" in which a healthy twin was aborted by mistake. The second abortion was performed on the advice of a doctor, for the baby boy with a congenital heart problem.

The Herald Sun said that "The mother then had an emergency caesarean section and the sick child was terminated in a three-hour operation". A family friend said that she is traumatised. 

Health Minister David Davis said: "This is an absolute tragedy for all concerned and my sympathies are with the family." However, Mr. Davis has a duty to immediately call for an overhaul of the barbaric Victorian abortion laws - where late term abortion is now available right up until birth (with a 600% increase in late term abortions at this very hospital since the 2008 Victorian abortion law reform).

Since the law reform, Melbourne has also seen some 40 women infected with hepatitis C, a mother almost killed in a late term abortion that should never have been performed and now the tragic loss of twin boys - not to mention the 22,000 other babies killed annually in Victoria. What is it going to take, Mr Davis?

The Victorian government fails to recognise that these twin boys and their family deserved better than abortion and must accept responsibility for the horrors occurring in clinics everyday in Victoria. 

Radio Interview with the ABC reporter dealing with the family concerned:  

http://www.abc.net.au/local/audio/2011/11/24/3375026.htm   

Related articles: http://cherishlife.org.au/cherish-blog 

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/11/23/hospital-kills-wrong-twin-in-abortion-both-babies-now-dead/

Federal MPs must reconsider RU486

Life Network Australia - Saturday, May 28, 2011
Is the silence on the devastating effects of the RU486 drug in South Australia, as deafening to you?  In 2006, the champagne flowed freely after what some from across all parties considered to be an outstanding achievement - the approval of the abortion drug by the "Therapeutic" Goods Administration. Every single MP who was a member of the ALP's Emily's List at the time supported the vote.
These "champions" of the drug must surely be reconsidering their passion for RU486!  Last year some 400 women were hospitalised in South Australia alone for botched RU486 abortions. We have no information of the long term physical or psychological outcomes for these patients and we hear nothing about the drug being withdrawn or at the very least, its use investigated. 
The Australian (see link for South Australia above) quoted Dr. Mulligan, who said that "Australian doctors are on a learning curve" in the use of RU486.  The idea of a "learning curve" is alarming when the lives of women, babies and families are so negatively affected by this drug, which some have likened to "backyard" abortions.

These MPs should have heeded the advice of an open letter to Federal Parliament, which strongly warned of the risks (now being experienced in S.A).  Despite being  "an internationally recognised feminist and academic who has worked on reproductive issues for 25 years and strongly supports a woman's right to safe and legal abortion", the author of the letter warned that "RU486 on its own works in only 40 to 60 per cent of women so that 48 hours after its administration a second drug, a prostaglandin, must be taken orally or inserted into the vagina. Since the 1970s, prostaglandins have been rejected by the women's health movement as far too dangerous to use as abortifacients as they cause such severe and painful contractions in some women that the uterus may be irreversibly damaged. They can also lead to uncontrollable blood loss."
She continued... "Moreover, in up to 10 per cent of women the RU486/prostaglandin abortion is incomplete. This necessitates that one or two weeks later they need to return to a medical clinic to remove the remains of the pregnancy by dilation and curettage. Apart from being dangerous, as the recent deaths in Sweden and the US have shown, this drawn-out period is hugely traumatic."

One would reasonably expect that Federal Parliament reconsider and investigate the use of RU486, given the alarming statistics from South Australia, which are more evidence of the under-regulation of abortion procedures and the damage that abortion continues to do to women (not to mention the unborn!).

Recent Posts


Tags


Archive