Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

The Case Against Abortion

Lauren's Story

Life Network Australia - Saturday, January 02, 2010
My story is one that eight years on at the age of 25, I still find hard to write – ashamed of the person I once was.  However, within those eight years I have found hope and healing and have been able to move on, live an incredibly happy life - still not forget what I did and what I have been through, but live.  For a long time, I didn’t think I’d make it.

My partner and I had spoken about what would happen if I fell pregnant, though we never ever thought that our discussions would become a reality.  We dreamed of getting married and having children, so incredibly in love – well we thought so, at 16!  He had been my best friend for two years before we finally got together and knowing each other so well, it didn’t take long before we took things to the next level.

One afternoon after school (we were in Year 11) we had realised that the condom had come off.  Laughing at first, an eerie silence soon took hold as we realised what the situation could mean.  Being very young and not knowing a whole lot about conception and knowing my period was due the next day, I got myself a pregnancy test thinking I would find out straight away whether I was pregnant.  To cut a long story short, it was positive as were the three tests I did directly after that  hoping to get a different result (I now realise I couldn’t have fallen pregnant that quickly and that I had obviously fallen pregnant on an earlier occasion within my cycle).

My partner came around that evening.  We just laid on my bed in silence for what seemed like forever.  Finally I asked him what he wanted me to do, not thinking about what I wanted but what did he want without considering me.  The answer was of course an abortion.  Very upset, I cried and explained that I couldn’t possibly do that, that I was going to run away.  I couldn’t tell my parents as they would have been so terribly disappointed, so I was going to leave and raise the baby myself.  He became very upset and tried to convince me to stay.  He left my house that night, not knowing whether I would be there the next day. Through the night I cried and prayed to God ‘Please don’t make this true and I will do anything.’  I also realised that there was no way I could run away and take care of myself and a baby.  I didn’t know what to do. 

Over the next few weeks I was just numb, working on autopilot. I went to school, dancing, saw friends and socialised like I normally would, acting normal to everyone I saw but terrified, panicked and confused on the inside.  It wasn’t long before the morning sickness kicked in and I was trying to hide continuous daily vomiting from my parents, teachers and other kids at school.  My partner and I cut school early and headed to a medical centre to get a final confirmation of what we already knew. 

Only to get the rudest, most condescending and judgmental doctor who refused to give me a blood test, instead offering a urine test.  This came back negative and gave us false hope that we weren’t pregnant.  A week later I returned and demanded a blood test which came back positive.


A decision was never made.  We never really discussed what we should do.  Instead, our lives just continued till we had to do something.  Christmas was five days away and I was terrified.  I was eight weeks pregnant with literally no concept of my future beyond each day.  I just switched off.  My partner made an appointment for the 22 December so it would be done before Christmas and timed with Carols in the Domain so we could explain to our parents that we were going into the city early to get a good spot for the carols, not to get an abortion.  We told only two close friends that I was pregnant, no one else knew, not our parents, no one.  We borrowed money from these friends and other people that we knew to be able to afford it.  I look back now and think it’s crazy that we had to borrow money off our friends for an abortion which only cost us $170 as we were entitled to a student discount and Medicare paid for the rest.


Because I was terrified that my parents would find out, I couldn’t use my Medicare card as I was unsure whether it would come up on anything sent to my parents but my mum carried the card for the whole family so it was impossible to use.  Instead, I took my friend’s card and assumed her identity.  I practiced her signature, memorised date of birth and address and other details and had everything done under her name.  So to this day, there are no records of myself ever being pregnant or having an abortion.  Every record is under her name.


The day came around and I got up early and met my partner at the train station.  We took the forty minute train trip to the city in complete silence.  It took us a while to find the place but when we did, we smiled at the security officer as we non-verbally fought and tried to get each other to walk in first.  Once we arrived I had to fill out some paper work (all using my friends name and information) and then write a few lines as to why I wanted to terminate the pregnancy.  To this question I just left a dash.


When called into counseling which lasted no longer than ten minutes and in which my partner didn’t accompany me, I just started crying.  She explained the procedure to me and asked me if I had any questions.  I said no.  She asked me to sign all the medical waivers and finally told me that if I wanted the procedure done then I had to answer the question to which I just answered with a dash, on the forms I filled out when I walked in - Why do you want to terminate this pregnancy?  I just told the lady that I didn’t know.  She said I had to come up with something and she spoke outloud as she wrote the words that she herself came up with and wrote on the form… “ Melinda is 17 and in Year 11 as is her partner.  They are not in a position psychologically or financially for the continuation of this pregnancy.  Melinda would like to finish school and go onto further study – she does not have the necessary resources for parenthood and to continue in this pregnancy would prove disastrous. She firmly believes termination to be her only option.”

I sat in the waiting room for another half hour before they called Melinda’s name.  When I got up to go in, my partner kept his head down and didn’t say a word.  He said nothing and didn’t even look at me.  That will stay with me always, it hurt so much.  My partner was a baseball player, a good one. He had baseball this day so once I went in he left. I told him he could go and it was silly him waiting around but it took me so long to forgive him for that. He left me there.

Once I went into the room they asked me to take off my pants and wrap sheet around me, they then put me on a metal operating table, it was so cold. The lady then grabbed my naked butt and yanked me down the table saying I needed my butt on the very edge, then I put my legs in the stirrups. I was so scared but just kept saying to myself it’ll be over soon, and repeating to myself ‘grow up you did this to yourself so deal with it, take responsibility, be mature’.

Then they put the needle in my arm and before I knew it I was out cold.  Unfortunately not for long. I woke up halfway through it. I remember hearing the anesthetist and the doctor talking, the machine going and taking a while to realize where I was before I completely freaked out and felt quite uncomfortable down there. I never opened my eyes. I didn’t want to see, I didn’t want them to know I was awake, I thought I’d get in trouble...I just kept saying to myself go to sleep go back to sleep. I must’ve because the next thing I remember is them helping me to the recovery room to my recliner chair with the other recliner chairs. I passed out.

I must’ve been balling my eyes out as I was in that chair knocked out. I don’t remember crying, just when I woke up I was all wet, covered in tears and the girl beside me gave me a box of tissues.  I wanted to reach out to all the other girls like the girl beside me had, but there was nothing to say.

Next thing I know the receptionist came in and over to me. She said there was a Lauren outside asking for me, did I know a Lauren? I freaked, I thought, my goodness they’ve found me out, that I was using someone else’s Medicare card. I was still all over the place from the drugs and had no idea, just scared I was in big trouble. So I told her no I didn’t know any Laurens (I am Lauren!! I didn’t say it). Then she said are you sure? And finally I realised that I was actually Melinda and that she must be outside saying she was Lauren. I agreed that I knew a Lauren and it was ok to tell her I was here.

I had a coffee, some pain killers and a biscuit and then the staff helped me outside. Outside was the real Melinda and her boyfriend waiting to pick me up. I thought I was going home alone but my partner had organised for her to come and get me.

Once outside and round the corner I balled my eyes out. I was so upset. I didn’t want Melinda and her boyfriend, I wanted my partner, he should’ve been there.

The next day, my grandfather passed away.  I was there to see it.  I was convinced his death was my fault, that because I took my child’s life, God took my grandfathers life. Two days later it was Christmas.  December is always a hard time for me.

My partner was very supportive, as much as he could be.  We stayed together for a year after this happened before my mental state broke him and he could deal with me no longer.  He moved to America after that to play baseball.

I’d like to say that with time I got better.  The pain and grief was unbearable, every fibre of your being, every part of your soul is broken and aches and you long for your child to be with you, to hold them, smell them, kiss them, hug them.  Nothing brings relief, not even your sleep.

Unfortunately for six years following the abortion I tried to commit suicide on three occasions, became a self harmer – cutting my legs with sharp objects to help make the pain tangible, and sabotaged my relationships.  A friend forced me into professional counseling which I attended weekly for five years trying to come to terms with what I did and the fallout from that day.  Soon after the abortion I became a Christian when I asked for God’s forgiveness sincerely and received it with open arms.  A weight was lifted but the pain, regret  and reality of what had happened still remained.  It is only through God’s grace and professional counseling that I did get better.  I told my parents what happened and joined my local church.  I met with our local cemetery and had a plaque put  in one of the gardens as a memorial to my daughter - a tangible place to acknowledge and mourn her.  I named her Bella-Jayne.

Seven years down the track I met the man of my dreams and was engaged and married within fourteen months.  I have never ever been happier and never imagined I would ever be ok, be married or about to try and start a family.  God delivered me from myself, it took a long time, hard work and I know its not all over.  I still have nightmares, flashbacks and some days cry the day away.  But I know I am forgiven, I know I can make it through anything and I know I will see my baby girl in heaven one day.

Newborns cry with an accent!

Life Network Australia - Thursday, November 12, 2009
Lauren Cox, ABC Medical News Unit (Nov 5) reveals that researchers have discovered that babies cry with an accent - the same as that of their native language by the 2nd day after birth.
 
The study analysed the cries of 30 French and 30 German babies.

Former Planned Parenthood Director's Anguish

Life Network Australia - Thursday, November 12, 2009
Former Planned Parenthood Director, Abby Johnson, has issued a wake up call to the public after her dramatic change of heart after viewing the abortion of a tiny 13 week old unborn baby.

Ms Johnson said that she was asked to assist in an ultrasound guided abortion and easily recognised the full side profile from the face to the feet on the ultrasound machine. She said "I saw the probe going into the woman's uterus, and at that moment I saw the baby moving and trying to get away from the probe."  She continued..."And I thought, 'It's fighting for its life and I thought, 'It's life.'  I mean, it's alive. ...My mind was racing, my heart was beating so fast, and I just was thinking, 'Oh my gosh, make it stop.' 

Then all of a sudden, it was over.  I saw the baby just literally crumble, and it was over."

Ms Johnson stated "If clinic workers saw what was happening on that screen, they would be running out of those clinics," Johnson concluded.  "This is what the abortion industry does not want their workers to see ... they don't want people to see what's actually happening in the woman's womb."

Full story and live FOX NEWS interview with Ms Johnson here.

Ms Johnson had worked at Planned Parenthood for eight years and had been its director for two, until becoming uncomfortable with Planned Parenthood 's demands for more abortion business because of the economic downturn.

In her interview with FOX NEWS, Ms Johnson said "Every meeting that we had was, 'We don't have enough money, we don't have enough money - we've got to keep these abortions coming, It's a very lucrative business and that's why they want to increase numbers."

"Planned Parenthood is an organization that really runs on fear. If somebody crosses them, they are quick to threaten that person.  I've worked for them for a long time and seen them threaten lawsuits multiple times," she said.

Life Site News reported the earnings of Planned Parenthood  in the U.S: "The latest financial report Planned Parenthood, for the year 2006-2007, shows that the abortion behemoth increased the number of abortions it committed from 264,943 in 2005 to 289,650 in 2006.  Total revenue amounted to over $1 billion dollars, with the organization's profit margin - "excess of revenue over expenses" - soaring from $55.7 million in 2005 to $112 million in 2006. The organization typically receives over $300 million in taxpayer funds every year".

According to Life Site News, Planned Parenthood has issued a restraining order against Ms. Johnson, which prevents her from releasing information until after a hearing scheduled for November 10th.

Abortion for Profit

Distress After Abortion Linked to Increased Mental Health Problems

Life Network Australia - Sunday, November 08, 2009

New Findings Indicate 85 Percent of Women Have Negative Reactions After Abortion

Springfield, IL (Nov. 8, 2009) -- A new study on mental health problems after abortion has found that 85 percent of women reported negative reactions to abortion, putting them at higher risk for mental health problems.

The paper, published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, found that more than 85 percent of women who aborted reported at least one negative reaction to abortion, such as such as sorrow, grief, regret or disappointment; and approximately 35 percent reported five or more negative reactions. 

The high numbers are of concern because the paper also found that the risk of mental disorders among women who had negative reactions to abortion was 40 to 80 percent higher than among women who didn't abort.

The results came from an ongoing survey that tracked women in the Christchurch area of New Zealand from birth to age 30. A subsample of about 530 women were given questions about their pregnancy history and mental health outcomes, including being asked whether the pregnancy was unwanted or unplanned, and their initial reaction to the pregnancy at the time.

Overall, more than 86 percent of women who had abortions also reported at least one positive reaction, such as feelings of relief, happiness or satisfaction. When the responses are broken down into categories, however, more women were likely to respond "not at all" when asked if they felt happiness (58 percent "not at all" vs. 23 percent "very much") or satisfaction (60 percent vs. 20 percent) about the abortion.

The research team concluded that "many women experience a mixture of both positive and negative emotions about having an abortion," but said that that the results don't support the belief that abortion is better for women than unwanted or unplanned pregnancy. 

"There is no evidence in this research that would suggest that unwanted pregnancies that come to term were associated with increased risks of mental health problems or that abortion mitigated the risks of mental health problems in women having unwanted pregnancy," the authors noted.

 
New Study Supports Previous Findings on Mental Health and Abortion

The latest findings follow two other studies led by the same researcher that also linked abortion to higher rates of mental health problems.

In 2005, they published findings showing that young women who had abortions subsequently experienced higher rates of suicidal behaviors, depression, substance abuse, anxiety and other mental health problems.

A second study in 2008 found that women were 30 percent more likely to experience mental health disorders after abortion than they were for other pregnancy outcomes. As with the current paper, this study found that women who continued an unwanted or mistimed pregnancy did not experience a significant increase in mental health problems--challenging arguments from abortion advocates that abortion is better for women than carrying an "unwanted" pregnancy to term.

 

Abortion Not As Safe as Presented, Authors Say

In the 2005 paper, the authors were critical of the American Psychological Association's claim that abortion does not pose mental health risks for most women. The study's lead author, Prof. David Fergusson, who has described himself as pro-choice, has been an outspoken critic of the APA and has called for more research into the safety of abortion.

Last year, Fergusson published an editorial supporting the position of the Royal College of Psychiatrists in the U.K., which said that the evidence suggests that abortion can increase mental health problems for some women. He also criticized a report by an APA task force that dismissed research linking abortion and mental health problems and which claimed that abortion is generally safe for most women. Read More

Besides the 85 percent of women reporting negative reactions in this study, other evidence suggests that many women do, in fact, find this experience distressing.

survey of American women who had abortions found that more than half said they felt rushed or uncertain about abortion and 64 percent reported feeling pressured by others to abort. Sixty-five percent of the survey respondents reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder that they attributed to their abortions, with slightly over 14 percent reporting all the symptoms for a diagnosis of PTSD.

Further, the evidence points to the need for health care providers and abortionists to screen women and girls for coercion and other known, statistically-validated factors that put them at risk for mental health problems after abortion. Such screening would help put an end to abortions that are unwanted, unsafe and unnecessary and would help protect the rights of both women and their unborn children.

The Legal Implications and Real Help for Women in NeedRead More

Visit the Elliot Institute's model bill to hold abortionists liable for failing to screen for coercion and psychological risk factors before abortion here.

Source: David M. Ferugsson, L. John Horwood and Joseph M. Boden, "Reactions to abortion and subsequent mental health," The British Journal of Psychiatry 195: 420-426 (2009).

 Contact: amy@afterabortion.info

Reproduced with permission.
 

In Europe its Lobsters In, Babies Out

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Article by Bill Muehlenberg
July 13, 2009

What do you call a continent which cares more about the rights and wellbeing of crabs, lobsters, and even the common octopus, than it does about unborn babies? Just in case you cannot come up with anything, let me suggest a few possibilities: deranged, degenerate, despicable and delirious. And just to keep the alliteration going: dumb, really dumb.

This is how the New Scientist begins its coverage of this bizarre story: “Animal welfare legislation generally applies only to vertebrates. There are, however, moves to include invertebrates. Proposed changes to European law, for example, would extend welfare laws to crabs and lobsters. Up to now the only invertebrate protected is the common octopus.

“‘Invertebrate rights’ has become a campaigning issue. Advocates for Animals recently produced a report which concludes that there is ‘potential for experiencing pain and suffering’ in crustaceans. The group is particularly concerned about boiling lobsters alive. The wider public is also showing interest. Research supposedly demonstrating that hermit crabs feel and remember pain received worldwide news coverage”

The author of the article in fact argues that such animals do not feel any significant pain. He concludes with these words: “Extending welfare to crustaceans would be a mistake. They are useful animals for research on nervous systems. Hopefully common sense and the basic scientific facts should dictate that invertebrates remain outside the legislation.”

While it is good to see a bit of sanity here, the very fact that this story was even raised shows just how far down the tubes the intellectualoids in Europe have gone. If the ruling elites in Europe can actually waste time ruminating over the rights of an octopus or a crab, then perhaps it is best that we just allow Europe to proceed in its terminal decline.

My European readers can correct me here, but I am not aware of any laws banning the killing of unborn babies. I am not aware of any legislation which confers rights on the unborn. I am not aware of any committees looking into ways to outlaw the pain unborn babies experience when undergoing abortions.

Interestingly, this article deals with one type of lobster death: “As for lobsters in boiling water, sensory nerves from crabs living in temperate waters fail irreversibly at 25 °C, about the temperature of tepid bath water. This procedure is not inhumane.”

I guess the European elites are not aware of how one abortion method entails burning a baby to death with a saline solution – now that’s gotta hurt. Other methods involve slicing the baby to pieces, sucking the brains out, and so on. If this is not bad enough, science has demonstrated that the unborn do indeed feel pain.

For example, surgeon Robert Shearin argues that unborn babies can experience pain at quite an early age: “As early as eight to ten weeks after conception, and definitely by thirteen-and-a-half weeks, the unborn experiences organic pain. . . . [At this point she] responds to pain at all levels of her nervous system in an integrated response which cannot be deemed a mere reflex. She can now experience pain.”

More recently a British review of the latest research has found that an unborn baby is definitely aware of pain by 24 weeks, and possibly aware as early as 20 weeks. But the pain of death is of course the biggest concern of all here. Even if the abortion procedure involved no pain at all, it still results in a dead baby.

But abortion is both painful and lethal. We rightly show pictures of young seals being clubbed to death, because we want to persuade civilised people to bring this awful practice to an end. It seems it is time we did the same with the awful practice of abortion, especially to those European bureaucrats.

The various buffoons and moral midgets running the show in Europe demonstrate why the continent is in such big trouble. This is simply one more indication of when the West rejects it Judeo-Christian foundations, the doors to the asylum are flung wide open, and mental and ethical haemorrhaging becomes endemic.

Used with permission.

Bill Muehlenberg's CultureWatch delivers reflective and incisive commentary on a wide range of issues, helping to sort through the maze of competing opinions, worldviews, ideologies and value systems.

 

Parental consent for piercings, but no parental consent for abortion.

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, July 22, 2009

As a mother of girls, LNA co-founder Sonja Couroupis, is horrified by any legislation that would deny her knowledge about the health and welfare of her children. “As a parent I have every right to know and influence the decisions made by my child under the age of 18 years. As a parent, that is a responsibility I assumed when they were conceived and do not consider it the right of any government to remove from my husband or myself.”

Abortion provider, Family Planning NSW, summarises the consent requirements in NSW. “A young woman 14 and 15 years of age may give valid consent to an abortion without her parent or guardian's knowledge. That is, if the doctor judges the young woman to be mature enough to understand the implications of making the decision. A young woman under 14 years of age should have the consent of a parent or guardian or an order from the Supreme Court before a doctor would perform an abortion.”

Compare with legislation introduced in Victoria last year which bans intimate body piercing for people under the age of 18 and requires parental consent for non-intimate piercing for people under the age of 16.

Save the baby kangaroos, but not the (unborn) baby humans?

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Those that are familiar with abortion statistics and abortion procedures in Australia will recognise the contradiction in the recent spate of animal programs and daily newspaper articles in which the media and the public agonise over saving baby kangaroos, possums, elephants, etcetera, yet turn a blind eye to the plight of so many of our unborn babies and their mothers. If only we could apply this wonderful compassion and care to our own offspring.

The Feminist Argument Against Abortion

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
It has been said that “abortion is the guarantor of a woman’s right to participate fully in the social and political life of society”.11 Unfortunately, this is the reality for many Australian women. Without control over their reproductive lives, women are often unable to get an education, pursue a career, or even maintain their role as a respected and valued member of society. But is abortion a solution, or part of the problem?

Feminists for Life of America (http://www.feministsforlife.org/) argue the following:

“The premise of male domination throughout the millennia (is) that it was nature which made men superior and women inferior. Medical technology is offered as a solution to achieve equality; but the premise is wrong … It’s an insult to women to say women must change their biology in order to fit into society.”

If society were to be structured such that tall people could not function properly, would we expect tall people to be grateful for legal access to surgery to shorten their legs? Would such access be a sign of our respect for tall people. Of course not. The appropriate way to value tall people would be to restructure society so that they could participate, and still remain tall. 

If pregnant or parenting women can’t fully participate in society, then surely the solution is to change society, not to force women to give up part of their unique abilities as 

women. It is a further insult to expect women to be grateful for the opportunity to give up their children. At best this is the better of two bad alternatives, at worst, it is expoitation.

Abortion therefore, is a sign that society has failed to meet the needs of women, and that women have had to settle for far less than they deserve. Abortion is not a solution for women, but part of the problem, enabling society to continue to devalue womens’ unique capacity to bear children. 

The question should not be whether a woman has the right to choose, but rather, should she have to choose – between being a valued, respected member of society and the life of her own child. When we fail to cherish motherhood, we force women to make such a choice, which is really no choice at all.

_______________________________________________

11 Kate Michelman, former President of the US organisation, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), quoted in The New York Times, May 10, 1988.

The Role of Law

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
It is reasonable and necessary for society to outlaw certain ‘choices’. The only way people can successfully live together in community is to give up a measure of personal freedom. Personal choices that infringe on the life or livelihood of another human being must be legislated against. Therefore, it is impossible to justify abortion by simply arguing that women should be ‘free to choose’ (http://www.abort73.com/index.php?/abortion/the_role_of_law)

In Australia, we legislate against driving under the influence of alcohol because of the likelihood for injury or death to another party. We outlaw smoking in public places, even in our own cars (where children are present), because of the potential impact on the health of others. This is because it is not OK to do whatever we want with our bodies when it adversely affects the health of others. The role of law is to curb the freedom of some, to ensure the more basic freedoms of others. 

Is choice a universal right? To be pro choice or anti choice makes no sense. It all depends on the ‘choice’ that we are talking about. It is silly to defend a specific choice on the basis that it is a choice. For example, few people are pro choice about rape, child abuse or cruelty to animals. No one has the ‘right’ to do such things. On the other hand, other choices are regarded as a right – matters of religion, politics and lifestyle, for example. Even poor choices may be permitted. No one will stop you from staying out late before an exam, leaving the milk out or wearing a heavy coat in summer. ‘Choice’ is only a right if it doesn’t harm others.

Opposing abortion is not about opposing the right to choose. It is about opposing the particular choice of abortion, on the grounds that it harms another person – the unborn child. It is reasonable to expect that our Government will restrict the freedom of some, to protect the welfare of others, just as it does in the cases of rape, slavery and assault.

When does life really begin?

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
An individual human life begins when the sperm unites with the egg – fertilization. This is a biological fact, undisputed amongst scientists and obstetric doctors. The beginning of life is attested to in both modern and older embryology texts, and by expert medical doctors (http://www.abort73.com/index.php?/abortion/medical_testimony). The question is about biology, not religion.

Dr Alfred M. Bongioanni, a professor of obstetrics has stated, “I have learned from my earliest medical eduation that human life begins at the time of conception … human life is present throughout this entire sequence from conception to adulthood … any interruption at any point throughout this time constitutes a termination of human life”. Speaking further about the early stages of the development in the womb he said “I am no more prepared to say that these early stages represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty is not a human being. This is human life at every stage”.9

Prominent abortion supporters (http://www.abort73.com/index.php?/abortion/medical_testimony) and providers10 also make this concession (http://www.abort73.com/index.php?/abortion/medical_testimony). In fact, there is no debate amongst honest, informed people: abortion kills distinct human beings. This is true no matter what the circumstances of conception, from conception onward. 

Finally, the fact that abortion kills is not lost on the many women who realise, too late, that the pregnancy that they have terminated has taken away their baby. If you are suffering grief after an abortion, you are not alone. This site has links to post abortion support services that may help.


________________________________________________

9 Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, Report, 97th Congress, 1st Session, 1981.
10 Aileen Klass, owner of the largest abortion clinic in Oregon in the US testified under oath: “Of course human life begins at conception”. Lovejoy Surgicenter v. Advocates for Life Ministries, et al., 1989 (United States).



Recent Posts


Tags


Archive