Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

Latest News

Melissa Ohden welcomes second baby and reflects on the language we use.

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Written by Melissa Ohden. 

Used with permission.

“Oh, that second one changes EVERYTHING!” Funny how, in the blink of an eye, everything changes.  Your family of three is suddenly a family of four, awaiting the move of child #2 from the womb to the outside world.  Your external focus on the goings-on of the world are now turned more internally towards your developing child and your changing, albeit happily, family.  And suddenly, those same folks who were wondering out loud for the last 3 ½ years since your first child was born about when you were going to give her a sibling, are the same folks who are suddenly lamenting to you about the difficulties they believe you will experience by having a second child. 

As a pro-life speaker and advocate, as an abortion survivor, I live my work every day.  I will never wake up one morning and suddenly forget about the fact that my life was supposed to end all in the name of someone else’s choice.  I will never be able to hold my children and not consider that they would never have existed if my biological mother’s abortion had succeeded in ending my life.  I will never not feel the calling to save and transform lives.  I will never underestimate the power of words, of the language that we use when we talk about children, about pregnancy and adoption, and how impactful those words really are.

During my pregnancy with Olivia, I was just so thrilled to be pregnant that I didn’t think much about the words that I used to describe her arrival into this world.  “We’re expecting! We’re having a baby!” Ryan and I would gush to anyone who would listen.  Now that we are pregnant with our second child, these words just don’t sit well with me when I talk about our family.  Maybe they do with some people, and I’m okay with that.  I’m not passing judgment, but simply making an observation about our family and the language of the culture that we live in today that fails, by and large, to acknowledge that life begins and deserves to be protected from the moment of conception.  Language is powerful and even insidious.  We aren’t “expecting.”  We aren’t having.  We have.  We are.  We are the parents of a child who just happens to be growing in my womb right now in preparation for entering the bigger world in May of 2012. 

When Ryan and I decided to get a t-shirt for Olivia that she could wear to proudly announce to our family and friends that she’s a big sister, I poured and poured over the shirts available.  “I’m going to be a big sister!” most of the shirts exclaimed.  I disappointedly looked at them.  Olivia’s not going to be a big sister, she is a big sister, I lamented.  There wasn’t going to be some magical time during my pregnancy or at the time of birth that suddenly her brother or sister was going to become her sibling—they already are siblings.  The fact that one of my children is growing inside of me right now while the other comes sneaking into our bed every night for a snuggle doesn’t change the fact of the matter.  Ryan and I are the parents of two children.  Olivia is a big sister.  Our second child exists, and we are anxiously awaiting seeing him or her face to face for the first time.  We were lucky to find just the right shirt for us that reflects our sentiments, as you will see in Olivia’s picture above.  (The radiant smile and twirling baton are just our daughter’s extra panache). 

How many times throughout any given day, though, do we use words like “expecting” and “going to be a big sister” to describe our life circumstances?  Certainly, I understand for the sake of brevity that these words are used (trust me, I’ve spent more time during this pregnancy explaining why we use the words that we do to unsuspecting individuals), but for someone like me, who as an aborted child whom miraculously lived, these words are a slippery slope in a culture of death.  It is no wonder to me that we are still fighting the description of children like me as a ‘blob of tissue,’ ‘clump of cells,’ or ‘product of conception,’ when, even as pro-lifers, the words that we use, the descriptions that we make about children are borderline questionable in terms of their respect for human life.

The first time that I excitedly told a fellow pro-life colleague that I was pregnant with our second child, instead of embracing me in a warm hug like I’d expected, they instead slapped me on the back and laughed heartily.  “Oh, that second one changes EVERYTHING! I’ll be praying for your patience and energy!”  Now, it’s hard to put to paper what the tone of that individual’s words were like, but I can tell you that the tone was ominous and the laugh was far too loud and long for my liking.  Maybe if they would have tempered their comments with “but really, we’re so happy for your family,” I would feel differently about the situation.  And maybe if I wouldn’t have kept receiving comments like that from friends and colleagues that I love and respect, I wouldn’t have thought anything of it.  But those same individuals who have been anxiously waiting for us to have another child are the same individuals who described a second child in such a matter.  Yes, I was disappointed by this behavior, but even more so, it left me thinking:  If people spoke to me, knowing my experiences and profession, in such a manner, how did they talk to others? And even more so, even though I had a wealth of knowledge and experience when it came to pregnancy, children, adoption and abortion, most people don’t have that kind of base to draw from.  How do the words that we use affect them? Do the words we use, however innocently, add to the culture of death and disrespect of human life from the moment of conception?

When I presented at the Real Choices Australia conference in Sydney, Australia, last May, I had prepared an in-depth Powerpoint marked by statistics and experiences of the adoption triad when it came to adoption.  I was prepared to lead a discussion about why so many young women tell me that they would much rather end the life of their children by abortion instead of making an adoption plan for them because of their perception that they couldn’t “give up” their child.  But as the knowledgable, professional pro-lifers from the diverse areas of pregnancy centers, right to life organizations, foster care and adoption agencies, and the field of education engaged in conversation with me and one another throughout the days of the conference, I knew there was something much more important that I needed to do.  I needed to focus their attention on the words that they were using to discuss the adoption process, adoptees, and birthparents.  “They gave them up.  They were given up,” were the predominant themes, as they are in so many places, even in our own organizations, even in our own houses, today.  This very week alone, at a Pregnancy Center banquet in Nebraska and an educational lecture at Ohio University, I have heard the words “given up” more times than I could count, even after I brought up the issue.

Although, as an adoptee, I can understand the feeling that one was “given up,” and I can only assume how painful it must be to make an adoption plan for your child and let them go from your arms, from your care, in the grand scheme of things, as adoptees, we were given life, and as birthparents, they gave us life.  That is a beautiful gift!  And as a speaker and advocate who travels and speaks to people around the world on a frequent basis, I can tell you that our words are so incredibly powerful when it comes to speaking about adoption.  No one wants to be perceived as a bad mother or a bad father, someone who “gave up” their child.  Sadly, so many women share with me that they aborted their child to avoid the judgment and condemnation of those around them.  Although each woman ultimately has a choice, I believe we have a responsibility to use language that strengthens and supports people, that highlights the love and selflessness that comes with adoption.

Like so many, I read with great sadness, about the passing of Steve Jobs today, the Founder and Ex-CEO of Apple.  And like many, I didn’t know before reading the article that Steve was an adoptee.  Here’s a short quote from the ABC website regarding his life and his passing: “But that personal life - he was given up at birth for adoption, had an illegitimate child …” What interesting language that was used to describe his adoption, and his fathering of a child out of wedlock! Are those words that are lifting up an amazing man whose gifts to our world are legendary?  Are those words lifting up the woman who gave life to an extraordinarily brilliant man and made an adoption plan for him? Are those words lifting up his child who is now mourning the loss of their father?

Language is powerful indeed.  One word can communicate so much.  One’s tone can reflect a negative or a positive connotation that is deftly picked up by the ears of those that are in crisis or in need.  Every child is a blessing.  Adoption is a gift to everyone in the adoption triad.  How very different those phrases sound, then ‘Oh, that second child!” and “given up.”  Yes, it often takes some time to retrain the way we speak to reflect our true thoughts and values, but I believe it’s worth it.  In just two short months, my 2nd child has given me the ability to not just think, but talk about their important life and role in our family in a manner that better reflects my belief about the importance of every human life from the moment of conception. 

Just one simple word you speak today could make the difference in building someone up or tearing someone down.  Just one simple word you speak today could make the difference in the life or death of a child.  I pray that your words breathe life into all of those you come into contact with.

Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Parental outrage - underage girls having 'secret' abortions.

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, May 17, 2011
 Lifesite News has reported that "New Zealand schools are coming under criticism from parents of teenage girls who obtained secret abortions arranged by school officials without their parents’ knowledge or consent".
An interview in the Sunday Star Times revealed that one mother had learned of her daughter's abortion four days after the procedure, when she confronted her daughter about the "tearful breakdowns" she was experiencing. Friends of the girl informed the mother that the school had made arrangements for an abortion. The outraged parent told The Sunday Star Times that she was unaware that the school had the authority to do that. She said it was wrong that teachers were required to inform parents about minor behavioral or scholastic issues but to withhold information about a major surgical procedure like an abortion.
According to the Sunday Star-Times, one teacher said that she "had seen parents become absolutely livid after finding out they had been kept out of abortion decisions".

Disturbingly, it is also possible that this situation is happening in Australia. With the 2008 Abortion Law Reform in Victoria, underage girls now have access to abortion up until birth (with the signature of two doctors after twenty four weeks), without their parents knowledge or consent. There is also no legal requirement for abortion providers to report suspected child abuse. As in New Zealand , most parents are totally unaware of this.

Parents need to be very aware of who is providing their child with sex education at school, and what the content of this sex education is. On my own daughter's very first day at a new private school, I was stunned to see her bring an assignment sheet home, provided by Family Planning Victoria. This outlined contraception options for her "current or future use" (it is still illegal for fourteen year olds to be having sex!). The sheet also advised her to contact Family Planning Victoria for any further information. I was concerned to learn (via my own phone call) that Family Planning Victoria refer for abortion. It is not difficult to see, given the current legislation, how easily any teenager in Victoria (at least) could access abortion, without parental knowledge.
This situation has been happening for years in the U.S, where abortion providers had a business strategy to become the 'sexperts' in the lives of teenagers and to provide girls between the ages of 13-18 with 3-5 abortions.

Related article:
Abortion law heartbreaking for parents : http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?  
Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Queen's Award for abortion campaigner

Life Network Australia - Monday, June 14, 2010

The Age has reported that Dr. Jo Wainer was "honoured with a Member in the General Division for her 'service to the community' as an academic and researcher in women's reproductive health rights."

According to the article, Dr Wainer fought for decades to have abortion removed from the Crimes Act (achieved in October 2008) and was there - "absorbing the moment she had spent decades campaigning for".

This award is a slap in the face from Premier Brumby to the thousands of Victorians who fought against the decriminalisation of abortion in his state. It is also a sad reflection on a man who condemns to death tens of thousands of Victorian babies killed each year in Victoria.  Indeed this campaign has resulted in a whopping 600% increase in late term abortions at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne.

Both Mr Brumby and Dr Wainer must also be held to account for the tens of thousands of women who undergo abortion each year due to a lack of economic or emotional support. 

Dr. Wainer will widen her agenda of death with international travel planned. Describing herself as "One of the tribal grandmothers", one can only ask "Of a head-hunting tribe?"

For further information, check out Bill Muehlenberg's insights into Ms Wainer's award as a reflection of our society, 'In Praise of Babykilling'.

Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Previous 1 Next

Recent Posts

  • Since when did pro aborts 'have the monopoly' on human development in the womb?!
  • ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
  • It's a boy! LNA co founder gives birth.
  • Melissa Ohden welcomes second baby and reflects on the language we use.
  • Pepsi using cells of aborted babies for flavour enhancer research
  • Abby Johnson in Australia!
  • Parental outrage - underage girls having 'secret' abortions.
  • Chilean and now Hungarian Governments advertise for protection of the unborn
  • The Death of Planned Parenthood?
  • Abby Johnson book exposes the ugliness of abortion

Tags

Political Lobby: Social Change Political Lobby Foetal Development Events Conferences Humanity of the unborn Reasons for Abortion Peaceful protest The Role of Law Social Change Pro Life Media Life Affirming Education Feminist Arguments International Pregnancy Support Moral Arguments Statistics Procedures Lobby Personal stories Research Pro Life Groups Social Commentary Legislation
  • Conferences (1)
  • Events (4)
  • Feminist Arguments (1)
  • Foetal Development (3)
  • Humanity of the unborn (5)
  • International (5)
  • Legislation (3)
  • Life Affirming Education (4)
  • Lobby (3)
  • Moral Arguments (1)
  • Peaceful protest (3)
  • Personal stories (5)
  • Political Lobby (13)
  • Political Lobby: Social Change (2)
  • Pregnancy Support (1)
  • Pro Life Groups (5)
  • Pro Life Media (1)
  • Procedures (3)
  • Reasons for Abortion (3)
  • Research (1)
  • Social Change (2)
  • Social Commentary (3)
  • Statistics (1)
  • The Role of Law (1)

Archive

  • February 2012 (1)
  • December 2011 (1)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • October 2011 (1)
  • August 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (1)
  • May 2011 (1)
  • April 2011 (1)

Belly

Inform
Inspire
Empower
 
     
Join our Facebook Group

lna
butterflyHURT BY ABORTION?
lna
butterflyPREGNANT & WORRIED?
lna
butterflyPASS THIS SITE ONTO A FRIEND
lna


Copyright © 2011 Life Network Australia Inc., All rights reserved | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site by Design Experts