Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

Latest News

Parental outrage - underage girls having 'secret' abortions.

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, May 17, 2011
 Lifesite News has reported that "New Zealand schools are coming under criticism from parents of teenage girls who obtained secret abortions arranged by school officials without their parents’ knowledge or consent".
An interview in the Sunday Star Times revealed that one mother had learned of her daughter's abortion four days after the procedure, when she confronted her daughter about the "tearful breakdowns" she was experiencing. Friends of the girl informed the mother that the school had made arrangements for an abortion. The outraged parent told The Sunday Star Times that she was unaware that the school had the authority to do that. She said it was wrong that teachers were required to inform parents about minor behavioral or scholastic issues but to withhold information about a major surgical procedure like an abortion.
According to the Sunday Star-Times, one teacher said that she "had seen parents become absolutely livid after finding out they had been kept out of abortion decisions".

Disturbingly, it is also possible that this situation is happening in Australia. With the 2008 Abortion Law Reform in Victoria, underage girls now have access to abortion up until birth (with the signature of two doctors after twenty four weeks), without their parents knowledge or consent. There is also no legal requirement for abortion providers to report suspected child abuse. As in New Zealand , most parents are totally unaware of this.

Parents need to be very aware of who is providing their child with sex education at school, and what the content of this sex education is. On my own daughter's very first day at a new private school, I was stunned to see her bring an assignment sheet home, provided by Family Planning Victoria. This outlined contraception options for her "current or future use" (it is still illegal for fourteen year olds to be having sex!). The sheet also advised her to contact Family Planning Victoria for any further information. I was concerned to learn (via my own phone call) that Family Planning Victoria refer for abortion. It is not difficult to see, given the current legislation, how easily any teenager in Victoria (at least) could access abortion, without parental knowledge.
This situation has been happening for years in the U.S, where abortion providers had a business strategy to become the 'sexperts' in the lives of teenagers and to provide girls between the ages of 13-18 with 3-5 abortions.

Related article:
Abortion law heartbreaking for parents : http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?  

Will we learn from baby Tegan Lane?

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, December 15, 2010

There have been many angles presented by the media in an attempt for us to analyse the tragedy of the murder of two day old baby Tegan. Her mother, Keli Lane has been found guilty of Tegan's murder, though her tiny body has never been found.

There are some disturbing elements in this case that highlights flaws in our legal and medical systems...and we need to be asking how the "reproductive rights" of one woman outweigh those of baby Tegan, the two babies she aborted, two she gave up for adoption and the men and families whose lives she has all but destroyed.

How can we as a society condone the handing out of multiple abortions and have no accountability for the lives being destroyed? How can an abortion provider not be legally required to screen for mental health problems? It is arguable that the life of baby Tegan and those aborted, who remain nameless and valueless by our society, may have been saved had the appropriate medical and psychological care been provided to Ms Lane.

The outgoing ALP Victorian government should feel concerned about this situation, as in 2010 they  voted down ammendments to provide independent counselling for women considering abortion and warning of the health risks of abortion. Another blaringly obvious issue in this case is the hypocrisy of the Victorian abortion legislation that would have allowed Ms Lane to kill Tegan just three days earlier, for "any current or future physical or psychological reasons."

 Peter Davidson's comment published by The Australian says it all: "Presumably, if she had simply had an abortion days, weeks or months earlier (as she in fact did with other pregnancies), there would have been no problem, yet the same child would have been deprived of her future. So her crime was not really one of killing, merely of timing. Legislation passed recently in Victoria allows the killing of an unborn child up to the moment of birth for any reason, and even an amendment to protect the life of a baby born alive following late-term abortion was voted down. Have we gone completely mad?"

A new government under the leadership of Ted Bailleu presents a wonderful opportunity to repeal the unacceptable abortion legsilation in Victoria and put measures in place to prevent situations like this.

Then there is the question of whether a womans "reproductive rights" should overshadow the rights of the father.

 

One of the men with whom Ms Lane had a child had no idea she had even been pregnant, let alone given up their child for adoption. The Australian reports the devastation he and his family have experienced in learning about the child that he has no legal claim to until he/she turns eighteen.  "It was a complete shock, I had no idea, and was so angry that such a thing had been kept from me. [Keli] has never even bothered to call and apologise for what she has put me through." "I never had a choice, I never had a say," he said. 
He and a second man whose identity has also not been revealed are " the collateral damage from Lane's years of lies and deceit"...but what of the father/s of the two aborted babies? Our current laws also disqualify men from having any say in the lives...or deaths of their unborn children. 

 

 

What we don't know is whether the father/s of the babies who were aborted even knew anything about them being conceived - given that she was able to hide those born and adopted out, it is highly unlikely. Under the current status quo, their rights (and those of all other fathers of unborn babies) are irrelevant.

Perhaps the most frightening aspect to this whole ongoing nightmare, is the lack of monitoring and accountability of our law makers and abortion providers and the possibility that Ms Lane's is not the only case of its type.

While justice may have been served for baby Tegan, there has been no justice for anyone else...not the men Ms Lane deceived, her own family, the babies she aborted, those she gave up for adoption (who have been denied any relationship with their fathers) and not even for Keli Lane, who was not provided the protection and counselling she so desperately needed. 

Life Network Australia calls on Ted Bailleu and the leaders of the others states to remember baby Tegan and to value new and unborn life, as well as their partners and families who currently have no say.  We also call on state leaders to protect women, like Keli Lane, by restricting abortion and by providing support and counselling for women in all kinds of situations. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

WA Premier opposes informed "choice"

Life Network Australia - Thursday, May 27, 2010

Channel 9 News has reported that W.A. Premier Colin Barnett does not support a backbench MP's proposal for women to undergo 3-D colour ultrasound imaging to view their unborn baby before being able to abort.

At an anti-abortion rally at Parliament House in Perth on Tuesday night, W.A. Liberal MP Peter Abetz recommended that ultrasounds be compulsory for women considering abortion.  Premier Barnett has said he considers such a move would "put a huge amount of personal pressure on someone who is already going through somewhat of a personal crisis, so I don't support that."

In the United States, some 16 states have signed legislation for women to view an ultrasound prior to an abortion.

Life Network Australia's President and mother of five, Sonja Couroupis, argues that whilst abortion lobbyists demand "choice" for women facing unplanned pregnancies, they are encouraging decisions that are not be backed by full information. "Ultrasounds are information, so why would anyone oppose that?" .

This necessary initiative will ensure that women in abortion clinics have access to modern medical information other women ordinarily receive in obstetric settings.

Mrs Couroupis believes that women are able to fully grasp the result of their decision regarding abortion if they view an ultrasound. "This is a life growing inside them, a wonderful thing - women deserve to see and know that!"


Recent Posts


Tags


Archive