Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

Latest News

Since when did pro aborts 'have the monopoly' on human development in the womb?!

Life Network Australia - Thursday, February 23, 2012

In the window of a privately owned Catholic bookstore in Albury, you will find the most spectacular and colourful time line of human life, from conception to old age. I had heard about it, so went to have a look. It really is breathtakingly beautiful!

Sadly, not all Abury locals agree! The Albury City Council have received complaints from members of the public and a representative of the council was sent to investigate. While he did not find it at all "offensive", he was going back to the office to check out the laws regarding this display.

(Within the last day, it was decided by the council representative that the window display has "a size issue" and that it "doesn't just advertise books, but to some people an ideology". The book store employee responded that "there was nothing religious or ideological about the window - just biological facts on human development, relating to products in the shop". She added that she didn't understand how people can be offended by images of a developing baby and that perhaps the same people are likely to offended by pregnant women. The council representative repeated that it was a "size issue" and the store employee stated that the display "would not be coming down".

While he stated that he could not comment officially, he said he could see that the complaints could possibly connected to those supportive of the local abortion facility.

The bookstore has asked for a copy of the law and how they have breached it, in writing).

The reaction to this display reminded me of another 'fetus- a-phobia' response I am aware of...

During the last Victorian election campaign, one of the 'Emily's List' candidates for Bendigo, Jacinta Allan (now MP) had an article published in the Bendigo Advertiser regarding "attacks on her staff". Sounds awful...except that this "attack" was actually just one of her staff members being shown a model of a ten week old baby!!  (The media overlooked the physical assault on a pro lifer by one of her own staff on another occasion!).

Yet another example was when my own daughter was doing sex education at a rural high school that she attended for a couple of years. I donated a copy of the DVD 'Baby Steps', which is beautiful footage of a baby growing in the womb, sucking its thumb, jumping around etc. I received feedback that the teacher I gave it to refused to show it to her class, because it "didn't promote abortion". The DVD did not engage in the "choice" debate, and was merely footage of life in the womb.

So you might begin to wonder, as I have many times (these are just three instances of many) - when did pro abortion advocates earn the right to deny or hide human development (mere biology) from the public and from our high school students? Is it guilt from their own involvement in abortion or their support of the abortion industry that has them in such a flap? Their efforts to conceal the beauty and humanity of early life is astounding!

Life in the womb is an incredible miracle - to be celebrated and studied closely. Our amazing human development speaks volumes about our value in this vast universe.Is it any wonder our abortion rate is so high, when girls and women are virtually forbidden to acknowledge and treasure human life in the womb - let alone the life growing inside their womb?!

So here lies the challenge - to engage gracefully with those who seek to deny you and/or your children the right to see displays, models or DVDs about life in the womb and ask why. Please also support and encourage those who present information about the beauty of unborn life, because there are many working tirelessly to deter them.

 

Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Melissa Ohden welcomes second baby and reflects on the language we use.

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Written by Melissa Ohden. 

Used with permission.

“Oh, that second one changes EVERYTHING!” Funny how, in the blink of an eye, everything changes.  Your family of three is suddenly a family of four, awaiting the move of child #2 from the womb to the outside world.  Your external focus on the goings-on of the world are now turned more internally towards your developing child and your changing, albeit happily, family.  And suddenly, those same folks who were wondering out loud for the last 3 ½ years since your first child was born about when you were going to give her a sibling, are the same folks who are suddenly lamenting to you about the difficulties they believe you will experience by having a second child. 

As a pro-life speaker and advocate, as an abortion survivor, I live my work every day.  I will never wake up one morning and suddenly forget about the fact that my life was supposed to end all in the name of someone else’s choice.  I will never be able to hold my children and not consider that they would never have existed if my biological mother’s abortion had succeeded in ending my life.  I will never not feel the calling to save and transform lives.  I will never underestimate the power of words, of the language that we use when we talk about children, about pregnancy and adoption, and how impactful those words really are.

During my pregnancy with Olivia, I was just so thrilled to be pregnant that I didn’t think much about the words that I used to describe her arrival into this world.  “We’re expecting! We’re having a baby!” Ryan and I would gush to anyone who would listen.  Now that we are pregnant with our second child, these words just don’t sit well with me when I talk about our family.  Maybe they do with some people, and I’m okay with that.  I’m not passing judgment, but simply making an observation about our family and the language of the culture that we live in today that fails, by and large, to acknowledge that life begins and deserves to be protected from the moment of conception.  Language is powerful and even insidious.  We aren’t “expecting.”  We aren’t having.  We have.  We are.  We are the parents of a child who just happens to be growing in my womb right now in preparation for entering the bigger world in May of 2012. 

When Ryan and I decided to get a t-shirt for Olivia that she could wear to proudly announce to our family and friends that she’s a big sister, I poured and poured over the shirts available.  “I’m going to be a big sister!” most of the shirts exclaimed.  I disappointedly looked at them.  Olivia’s not going to be a big sister, she is a big sister, I lamented.  There wasn’t going to be some magical time during my pregnancy or at the time of birth that suddenly her brother or sister was going to become her sibling—they already are siblings.  The fact that one of my children is growing inside of me right now while the other comes sneaking into our bed every night for a snuggle doesn’t change the fact of the matter.  Ryan and I are the parents of two children.  Olivia is a big sister.  Our second child exists, and we are anxiously awaiting seeing him or her face to face for the first time.  We were lucky to find just the right shirt for us that reflects our sentiments, as you will see in Olivia’s picture above.  (The radiant smile and twirling baton are just our daughter’s extra panache). 

How many times throughout any given day, though, do we use words like “expecting” and “going to be a big sister” to describe our life circumstances?  Certainly, I understand for the sake of brevity that these words are used (trust me, I’ve spent more time during this pregnancy explaining why we use the words that we do to unsuspecting individuals), but for someone like me, who as an aborted child whom miraculously lived, these words are a slippery slope in a culture of death.  It is no wonder to me that we are still fighting the description of children like me as a ‘blob of tissue,’ ‘clump of cells,’ or ‘product of conception,’ when, even as pro-lifers, the words that we use, the descriptions that we make about children are borderline questionable in terms of their respect for human life.

The first time that I excitedly told a fellow pro-life colleague that I was pregnant with our second child, instead of embracing me in a warm hug like I’d expected, they instead slapped me on the back and laughed heartily.  “Oh, that second one changes EVERYTHING! I’ll be praying for your patience and energy!”  Now, it’s hard to put to paper what the tone of that individual’s words were like, but I can tell you that the tone was ominous and the laugh was far too loud and long for my liking.  Maybe if they would have tempered their comments with “but really, we’re so happy for your family,” I would feel differently about the situation.  And maybe if I wouldn’t have kept receiving comments like that from friends and colleagues that I love and respect, I wouldn’t have thought anything of it.  But those same individuals who have been anxiously waiting for us to have another child are the same individuals who described a second child in such a matter.  Yes, I was disappointed by this behavior, but even more so, it left me thinking:  If people spoke to me, knowing my experiences and profession, in such a manner, how did they talk to others? And even more so, even though I had a wealth of knowledge and experience when it came to pregnancy, children, adoption and abortion, most people don’t have that kind of base to draw from.  How do the words that we use affect them? Do the words we use, however innocently, add to the culture of death and disrespect of human life from the moment of conception?

When I presented at the Real Choices Australia conference in Sydney, Australia, last May, I had prepared an in-depth Powerpoint marked by statistics and experiences of the adoption triad when it came to adoption.  I was prepared to lead a discussion about why so many young women tell me that they would much rather end the life of their children by abortion instead of making an adoption plan for them because of their perception that they couldn’t “give up” their child.  But as the knowledgable, professional pro-lifers from the diverse areas of pregnancy centers, right to life organizations, foster care and adoption agencies, and the field of education engaged in conversation with me and one another throughout the days of the conference, I knew there was something much more important that I needed to do.  I needed to focus their attention on the words that they were using to discuss the adoption process, adoptees, and birthparents.  “They gave them up.  They were given up,” were the predominant themes, as they are in so many places, even in our own organizations, even in our own houses, today.  This very week alone, at a Pregnancy Center banquet in Nebraska and an educational lecture at Ohio University, I have heard the words “given up” more times than I could count, even after I brought up the issue.

Although, as an adoptee, I can understand the feeling that one was “given up,” and I can only assume how painful it must be to make an adoption plan for your child and let them go from your arms, from your care, in the grand scheme of things, as adoptees, we were given life, and as birthparents, they gave us life.  That is a beautiful gift!  And as a speaker and advocate who travels and speaks to people around the world on a frequent basis, I can tell you that our words are so incredibly powerful when it comes to speaking about adoption.  No one wants to be perceived as a bad mother or a bad father, someone who “gave up” their child.  Sadly, so many women share with me that they aborted their child to avoid the judgment and condemnation of those around them.  Although each woman ultimately has a choice, I believe we have a responsibility to use language that strengthens and supports people, that highlights the love and selflessness that comes with adoption.

Like so many, I read with great sadness, about the passing of Steve Jobs today, the Founder and Ex-CEO of Apple.  And like many, I didn’t know before reading the article that Steve was an adoptee.  Here’s a short quote from the ABC website regarding his life and his passing: “But that personal life - he was given up at birth for adoption, had an illegitimate child …” What interesting language that was used to describe his adoption, and his fathering of a child out of wedlock! Are those words that are lifting up an amazing man whose gifts to our world are legendary?  Are those words lifting up the woman who gave life to an extraordinarily brilliant man and made an adoption plan for him? Are those words lifting up his child who is now mourning the loss of their father?

Language is powerful indeed.  One word can communicate so much.  One’s tone can reflect a negative or a positive connotation that is deftly picked up by the ears of those that are in crisis or in need.  Every child is a blessing.  Adoption is a gift to everyone in the adoption triad.  How very different those phrases sound, then ‘Oh, that second child!” and “given up.”  Yes, it often takes some time to retrain the way we speak to reflect our true thoughts and values, but I believe it’s worth it.  In just two short months, my 2nd child has given me the ability to not just think, but talk about their important life and role in our family in a manner that better reflects my belief about the importance of every human life from the moment of conception. 

Just one simple word you speak today could make the difference in building someone up or tearing someone down.  Just one simple word you speak today could make the difference in the life or death of a child.  I pray that your words breathe life into all of those you come into contact with.

Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Late term abortion and foetal pain

Life Network Australia - Saturday, May 08, 2010

The cruel intent of the 2008 Victorian legislation is made apparent through the amendments that were rejected. One such amendment was anaesthetic for the unborn baby being aborted.

In the abortion debate many argue that the unborn babies do not experience pain. Research has indicated that this is not the case, but in fact abortions performed on babies between 20-30 weeks is a "uniquely vulnerable time, since the pain system is fully established, yet the higher level pain-modifying system (pain inhibitors) has barely begun to develop. A 20-30 week old foetus actually will feel more pain than an adult. (“Physical Examination and Health Assessment” by Jarvis 5th Edition p 183)

Dr. Paul Ranalli made a presentation on  "Pain, Foetal Development, and Partial-birth Abortion" on June 27, 1997. He said that, "The foetus can feel pain at 20 weeks. This is probably a conservatively late estimate, but it is scientifically solid. Elements of the pain-conveying system (spino-thalamic system) begin to be assembled at 7 weeks; enough development has occurred by 12-14 weeks that some pain perception is likely, and continues to build through the second trimester. By 20 weeks, the spino-thalamic system is fully established and connected."

He described three indicators that provide evidence for the pain felt by an unborn baby (see below).

"There are three different indicators providing evidence that the foetus feels pain.

Anatomical
  - pain receptors spread over the body in stages: 8-16 weeks
  - pain impulse connections in the spinal cord link up and reach the thalamus (the brain's reception center): 7-20 weeks (summarized by Anand, K.J.S., Atlanta)

Physiological/Hormonal
  - foetuses withdraw from painful stimulation
  - two types of stress hormones, normally released by adults subjected to pain, are released in massive amounts by the foetus subjected to a needle puncture to draw a blood sample:
   (a) from 19 weeks onward (N. Fisk; London, England)
   (b) from 16 weeks onward (J. Partch; Kiel, Germany)

Behavioral
  - withdraw from pain
  - change in vital signs. "

This scientific information is extremely disturbing in the light of the recent increase in late term abortions in Victoria.

Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Previous 1 Next

Recent Posts

  • Speaker on the ‘Life Breakthru Tour’ of Australia Listens to Women … from both sides of the abortion debate.
  • Pregnancy support centre opened in Surry Hills
  • 50 women who contracted hepatitis C at late-term abortion facility launch class action suit
  • Since when did pro aborts 'have the monopoly' on human development in the womb?!
  • ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
  • It's a boy! LNA co founder gives birth.
  • Melissa Ohden welcomes second baby and reflects on the language we use.
  • Pepsi using cells of aborted babies for flavour enhancer research
  • Abby Johnson in Australia!
  • Parental outrage - underage girls having 'secret' abortions.

Tags

Reasons for Abortion Pro Life Groups Life Affirming Education Peaceful protest Political Lobby: Social Change Humanity of the unborn Prayer Statistics Events The Role of Law Pregnancy Support Moral Arguments Lobby Legislation Political Lobby Feminist Arguments Foetal Development Pro Life Media Personal stories Procedures Social Change Social Commentary International Research Conferences
  • Conferences (1)
  • Events (5)
  • Feminist Arguments (1)
  • Foetal Development (3)
  • Humanity of the unborn (5)
  • International (6)
  • Legislation (3)
  • Life Affirming Education (4)
  • Lobby (3)
  • Moral Arguments (1)
  • Peaceful protest (3)
  • Personal stories (5)
  • Political Lobby (13)
  • Political Lobby: Social Change (2)
  • Prayer (1)
  • Pregnancy Support (2)
  • Pro Life Groups (5)
  • Pro Life Media (1)
  • Procedures (3)
  • Reasons for Abortion (3)
  • Research (1)
  • Social Change (2)
  • Social Commentary (3)
  • Statistics (1)
  • The Role of Law (1)

Archive

  • September 2012 (1)
  • June 2012 (1)

Belly

Inform
Inspire
Empower
 
     
Join our Facebook Group

lna
butterflyHURT BY ABORTION?
lna
butterflyPREGNANT & WORRIED?
lna
butterflyPASS THIS SITE ONTO A FRIEND
lna


Copyright © 2011 Life Network Australia Inc., All rights reserved | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site by Design Experts