Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

Latest News

Best Wishes From Real Choices Australia

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, December 21, 2010
From RCA to you..... 

The staff and Board of Real Choices Australia wish to extend to you the warmest wishes for a safe and joyous Christmas season.  We thank you for your support during 2010 and look forward to your ongoing support as we move into 2011.

 
It is only through the generosity of our donors and sponsors that we are able to work toward a culture of support for women experiencing unintended pregnancy, and to help give voice to those who have suffered through abortion. 
 
This Christmas we especially remember those who have lost  a child through abortion, women, men, grandparents and other family members, that they may feel the compassion and understanding they need to work toward healing their grief. 
 
Please consider a generous gift of financial support to Real Choices Australia for us to continue to plan projects into the future.  Donate Today
 
 



2011 Conference 
Real Choices Australia is holding its first annual conference in Sydney from May 13-15 2011 in Sydney, Australia.
 
International Keynote speakers include:  Melissa Ohden and Priscilla Coleman.    more on the conference...
 
Abstracts for presentation open now.  Do you have some research, case studies, or great new initiatives to support post abortive women?   How about an innovative pregnancy support service, or new program?   This is your chance to present your idea or research at a national conference.  There are 2 streams:  Post abortion research and Pregnancy support options, over 2 days.     Submit your abstract     




Real Choices Australia, PO Box 157, Wodonga, Victoria 3689, AUSTRALIA




Comments
Post has no comments.
Post a Comment




Captcha Image

Trackback Link
http://www.lifenetwork.org.au/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=2642&PostID=105468&A=Trackback
Trackbacks
Post has no trackbacks.

 



Time for Getup to Get Off it!!

Life Network Australia - Monday, December 20, 2010

Time for GetUp to get off it

Written by Bill Muhlenberg
Used with permission.

GetUp is an online-based lobby group which bills itself as an “independent political movement to build a progressive Australia”. It of course is in fact a radical leftist bunch of activists who want to radically remake Australia in their own image.

It is pushing every radical, trendy cause around. It is hardly interested in what ordinary Australians think. It is only interested in pushing its radical activist agendas. A perfect illustration of this concerns an attempt to have the protection of unborn babies become one of its campaigns.

GetUp actually asked people to suggest and vote on campaign ideas. So that some pro-life folks in fact did. In good faith they offered the recognition of the human rights of the unborn as a great campaign. It seemed like a perfect campaign for this lobby group to embark upon.

In a few short days votes from around the country pushed this item to number 2 or 3 on their list of top causes. Yet what did GetUp do about this? It simply dumped it, claiming it was not something GetUp would run with. It does not align with “GetUp’s values” as they said on their site.

So just what value does it promote? And this from the very folks who go on and on about social justice! This from a group which is so proud to stand up for the needy and the underprivileged. This from a group which seeks to take the high moral ground.

There can be no greater social justice than to allow unborn babies the right to life. Without that most fundamental and basic of human rights, there can be no other rights. But the radicals of the secular left don’t really care about genuine social justice. All they want to do is further their cultural Marxism crusade, and their war against the West.

Already concerned individuals are speaking up about this gross hypocrisy on the part of GetUp. Let me here simply offer the first two I have come across. I will just reprint their press releases in full. The first is from James Leach, Victorian President of Vitae Australia:

“It is disappointing Get Up! have chosen to shut down this campaign idea and not allowed voting to continue. In just a couple of days It would have likely become the most voted for issue and by closing voting Get Up! are denying members the right to show how much they care about rights for the unborn. It is clear that Get Up! are not interested in democracy or freedom of speech, otherwise they would have allowed voting to continue. Instead all they are care about is pushing the already established agenda of those in charge.

“Simply because many supporters of this campaign are Pro Life does not mean their votes are invalid. This was a campaign to give rights to human beings after 20 weeks of development so of course Pro Lifers are going to support it even if they believe that it doesn’t go far enough.

“The issue of foetus rights can not be seen as a separate issue to abortion because if the foetus has rights than abortion is a violation of those rights. In other words you cannot legally protect unborn children in the womb from assault and car accidents while not banning late term abortions because whether or not a child has rights cannot be dependent on whether or not that child is wanted.

“While Vitae did not instigate this campaign we fully support its aims and commend griffibo for proposing it. Due to the large amount of support it has received Vitae will be running a similar campaign next year. To find out how you can support the fight to give the unborn rights join our Facebook group so we can keep you updated:  http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=24689967484

The second is from Warwick Marsh of the Fatherhood Foundation:

“GetUp has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of their members’ funds running ads supporting the summary removal of babies human rights through abortion and yet they are betraying their own constituency. A group called Labor4Life ran a campaign on the GetUp Campaign Ideas page for new campaigns. Human Rights for unborn children got 1,869 votes by GetUp members as against the pro abortion campaign which at the same time was sitting at 571 votes at the same time.

“This is a ratio of 3 to 1 for life and against abortion. It should be noted that the highest vote for any one campaign was 2,209. So the Human Rights for Unborn children was just below the highest vote on the campaign page at 1,869 votes. To put this in perspective for the average punter: Human Rights for Unborn children was number three out of 446 campaign ideas. It was leading by a massive majority of GetUp members and yet it was axed by the powers that be.

“At approximately 11AM this morning (EST) 20th December GetUp summarily removed the offending member driven campaign for Human rights and offered the following pathetic and hypocritical statement. They said they consulted their members but we have comments from GetUp members who are part of our Facebook site who say they were never consulted (http://www.facebook.com/canberra.declaration ).

“We encourage you to use the enclosed information to show Australia what Hypocrites Get Up are. They are not member driven as they so loudly proclaim but they are possessed of a ideology of extreme and fringe causes which puts them at odds with many of their devoted members who love the environment and also love life as well. This is the hypocrisy of the highest order. GetUp is beholden to no one. Only its extreme antilife and antifamily fringe policies of its dictatorial leaders will prevail. It has lost contact with its members who in the main are prolife and pro the environment.

“Instead GetUp is pushing fringe policies of the extreme left like Euthanasia, abortion and homosexual marriage which are more in line with their elite taskmasters. Getup does not represent its constituency. They have betrayed them at every turn. Please send this information to every journalist you know as this is a national news story.”

Of course GetUp is not alone is such gross hypocrisy and double standards. There are plenty other examples of lefty secularists whose morality is greatly selective, to say the least. But this is a great example of what a bogus bunch these groups can be.

It is time for GetUp to get off its high horse, and admit to all the world what its real agenda is.

Aussie taxes funding international abortion industry

Life Network Australia - Thursday, December 16, 2010

AUSTRALIAN TAXES FUND ABORTIONS IN MONGOLIA

“The Australian taxpayer is funding abortions in Mongolia and the question is, ‘why?’” said The Nationals’ Senator Ron Boswell today.

“Why is Australia funding abortion services when taxpayers’ money could be used for life giving medical, water, housing and food programs?”

Senator Boswell was commenting on the release of answers to his questions on notice to the Senate Estimates Hearings in October.

“For the first time in history, Australia’s aid program is funding abortions in overseas countries.”

“The Labor government changed the rules by applying new Australian Aid Program Family Planning Guiding Principles that facilitate the funding of overseas abortions.”

“Department answers to my questions show that from July this year Marie Stopes International received $63,426 from Aus-AID for abortion related services in Mongolia while International Planned Parenthood Foundation received $9m core funding for its work which includes abortion services in numerous countries.”

“The taxpayer money that went to Mongolia provided medical abortion drugs, equipment and family planning commodities.”

Senator Boswell said that Australians were generous to those in need and supported foreign aid but would question the government’s priorities in giving money to controversial action such as abortions when there were still so many dying of hunger and thirst.

Will we learn from baby Tegan Lane?

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, December 15, 2010

There have been many angles presented by the media in an attempt for us to analyse the tragedy of the murder of two day old baby Tegan. Her mother, Keli Lane has been found guilty of Tegan's murder, though her tiny body has never been found.

There are some disturbing elements in this case that highlights flaws in our legal and medical systems...and we need to be asking how the "reproductive rights" of one woman outweigh those of baby Tegan, the two babies she aborted, two she gave up for adoption and the men and families whose lives she has all but destroyed.

How can we as a society condone the handing out of multiple abortions and have no accountability for the lives being destroyed? How can an abortion provider not be legally required to screen for mental health problems? It is arguable that the life of baby Tegan and those aborted, who remain nameless and valueless by our society, may have been saved had the appropriate medical and psychological care been provided to Ms Lane.

The outgoing ALP Victorian government should feel concerned about this situation, as in 2010 they  voted down ammendments to provide independent counselling for women considering abortion and warning of the health risks of abortion. Another blaringly obvious issue in this case is the hypocrisy of the Victorian abortion legislation that would have allowed Ms Lane to kill Tegan just three days earlier, for "any current or future physical or psychological reasons."

 Peter Davidson's comment published by The Australian says it all: "Presumably, if she had simply had an abortion days, weeks or months earlier (as she in fact did with other pregnancies), there would have been no problem, yet the same child would have been deprived of her future. So her crime was not really one of killing, merely of timing. Legislation passed recently in Victoria allows the killing of an unborn child up to the moment of birth for any reason, and even an amendment to protect the life of a baby born alive following late-term abortion was voted down. Have we gone completely mad?"

A new government under the leadership of Ted Bailleu presents a wonderful opportunity to repeal the unacceptable abortion legsilation in Victoria and put measures in place to prevent situations like this.

Then there is the question of whether a womans "reproductive rights" should overshadow the rights of the father.

 

One of the men with whom Ms Lane had a child had no idea she had even been pregnant, let alone given up their child for adoption. The Australian reports the devastation he and his family have experienced in learning about the child that he has no legal claim to until he/she turns eighteen.  "It was a complete shock, I had no idea, and was so angry that such a thing had been kept from me. [Keli] has never even bothered to call and apologise for what she has put me through." "I never had a choice, I never had a say," he said. 
He and a second man whose identity has also not been revealed are " the collateral damage from Lane's years of lies and deceit"...but what of the father/s of the two aborted babies? Our current laws also disqualify men from having any say in the lives...or deaths of their unborn children. 

 

 

What we don't know is whether the father/s of the babies who were aborted even knew anything about them being conceived - given that she was able to hide those born and adopted out, it is highly unlikely. Under the current status quo, their rights (and those of all other fathers of unborn babies) are irrelevant.

Perhaps the most frightening aspect to this whole ongoing nightmare, is the lack of monitoring and accountability of our law makers and abortion providers and the possibility that Ms Lane's is not the only case of its type.

While justice may have been served for baby Tegan, there has been no justice for anyone else...not the men Ms Lane deceived, her own family, the babies she aborted, those she gave up for adoption (who have been denied any relationship with their fathers) and not even for Keli Lane, who was not provided the protection and counselling she so desperately needed. 

Life Network Australia calls on Ted Bailleu and the leaders of the others states to remember baby Tegan and to value new and unborn life, as well as their partners and families who currently have no say.  We also call on state leaders to protect women, like Keli Lane, by restricting abortion and by providing support and counselling for women in all kinds of situations. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

LNA Victorian Election Update

Life Network Australia - Sunday, December 12, 2010

Things have been quiet on the Life Network Australia website for the last month, but lots happening to catch you up on.
Sonja has been working with a Bendigo group, The Bendigo Social Justice Action Group and Linda has been up to her ears in work and family life.
I am sure everyone of you is also busy wrapping things up (excuse the pun) before Christmas and the New Year.
A little about the Victorian election...
Pro life groups have worked tirelessly during the Victorian election campaign period to highlight the actions of those Members of Parliament who supported the barbaric 2008 Victorian Abortion law reform.
Margaret Tighe, now Vice President of Right to Life Australia and RTLA have been credited by The Tasmanian Times with unseating six of the eight MP's that they targetted. One of these (now former) MP's was EMILY List's Maxine Morand who was responsible for tabling the abortion legislation. RTLA letter boxed and protested at her office in Mount Waverley.
In Bendigo, RTLA,  Lifevote and the Bendigo Social Justice Action Group (BSJAG) all campaigned to unseat the ALP member for Bendigo East, Jacinta Allan. Ms Allan's seat was a marginal seat, but the media predicted an easy win. Mr Brumby and Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, both attended the state ALP launch in Bendigo.
 The BSJAG ran a TV, radio and newpaper campaign, protested at The Green's launch (also held in Bendigo), the ALP launch and at Ms Allan's office. Sonja participated in a debate with the CEO of Loddon Mallee Women's Health Clinic on IPTV and Mike Bowen drove a truck through Bendigo advertising Ms Allan's support of abortion up until birth.
RTLA letterboxed Ms Allan's electorate twice, ran newspaper advertisements and had a mobile billboard (on a trailer) driving through Bendigo.
 Lifevote also letter boxed Ms Allan's electorate.
While Ms Allan retained her seat of Bendigo East, there was a 3% swing against her in the primary votes, 1% after preferences were distributed.
One thing that become obvious very early was the support Ms Allan had from a prominent and well supported Bendigo newspaper. It also became very apparent that much of the Bendigo public, including ALP supporters and staff (including her former legal adviser) did not believe that abortion is now legal up until birth, something that Ms Allan avoided making a single comment on.
The member for Shepparton, Janette Powell was the only National Party MP in the lowerhouse to vote for the bill. Ewan McDonald who stood as a candidate in the Northern Victoria Region (upperhouse) arranged to letter box drop her electorate with the RTLA brochure. Shepparton was not a marginal seat, but the campaign had WIN News and the people of Shepparton talking about abortion, the 2008 legislation and Ms. Powell's support of it.
Overall, the efforts of the pro life groups are to be commended. The public are more informed and a message has been sent loud and clear that advocates of the unborn will not be silenced.

We congratulate courageous and outspoken pro life MPs, Bernie Finn (Lib), Christine Campbell (ALP) and Peter Ryan (Nat) on their re-election to the Victorian Parliament. We look forward to great things in 2011!

Anglican synod ignores aborted babies born alive

Life Network Australia - Sunday, December 12, 2010

Information reproduced with permission.

Life Network Australia reported that the Victorian Government voted against an investigation into the deaths of 54 babies born alive after failed abortions and left to die, in 2007.

Reverend Mark Durie tabled a motion to bring this information before the Anglican synod, who supported the decriminalisation of abortion in Victoria in 2008. 

The motion was that this Synod:
 Examine:

  1. a reported six-fold increase in late-term abortions being performed at the Royal Women's Hospital since the introduction of the Abortion Law Reform Bill in October 2008;[1] and
  2. a reported 52 cases in 2007 of late-term abortions (15% of the total in that year) which resulted in babies being born alive;

Call upon the State Government of Victoria to investigate and report to the people of Victoria on the following matters:
  1. How many late-term abortions are being performed in Victoria every week, and at how many weeks gestation?
  2. What are the reasons these abortions are being performed, and in what proportions?
  3. For those babies born alive as a result of a late-term abortion, were the neonates given the medical care at birth which a new born infant would normally be entitled to, and what was their cause of death?
  4. What has been the effect on staff morale of the reported six-fold increase in late-term abortions being performed at the Royal Women's Hospital?
  5. What impact has the reported increase in late-term abortions had on policies for recruitment of staff at the Royal Women's Hospital?
Moved:  Revd Dr Mark Durie, St Mary's Caulfield.  Seconded: Revd Mark Hood, St Mark's Camberwell.

[1] Channel 7 News, 17 April 2010.  <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AeFdCG4gEg>

[2] Annual Report for the Year 2007, The Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity, p.11. <http://www.health.vic.gov.au/ccopmm/downloads/ccopmm_annrep07.pdf>

 News Weekly  reported that "Unfortunately, Dr Durie's motion at the Anglican synod was not voted on as Rev. Dr Ray Cleary, a theology lecturer and former chief executive officer of Anglicare Victoria (Victoria's largest provider of support services for children and families), moved that the synod move on to the next item on the agenda". 

Disappointment is an understatement, given the extreme impact of this decision (and that of the Victorian Government's refusal to investigate) on late term babies being aborted and left to die if born alive. It is appalling and heartless that these babies do not warrant even a debate.
Reverend Durie prepared a speech to present but was denied the opportunity to - his speech can be found here


Recent Posts


Tags


Archive