Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

Abortion in Australia

Why so many abortion workers have turned pro-life.

Life Network Australia - Saturday, January 30, 2010

Warning - This article contains graphic descriptions of abortion procedures. Note that while the article was written in the US, the 'dilation and evacuation' (D&E) method is also used in Australia.

MUGGED BY ULTRASOUND
Why so many abortion workers have turned pro-life.

By David Daleiden and Jon A. Shields*

Abortion rights activists have long preferred to hold themselves at some remove from the practice they promote; rather than naming it, they speak of “choice” and “reproductive freedom.” But those who perform abortions have no such luxury. Instead, advances in ultrasound imaging and abortion procedures have forced providers ever closer to the nub of their work. Especially in abortions performed far enough along in gestation that the fetus is recognizably a tiny baby, this intimacy exacts an emotional toll, stirring sentiments for which doctors, nurses, and aides are sometimes unprepared. Most apparently have managed to reconcile their belief in the right to abortion with their revulsion at dying and dead fetuses, but a noteworthy number have found the conflict unbearable and have defected to the pro-life cause.


In the aftermath of Roe v. Wade, second-trimester abortions were usually performed by saline injection. The doctor simply replaced the amniotic fluid in the patient’s uterus with a saline solution and induced labor, leaving it to nurses to dispose of the expelled fetus. That changed in the late 1970s, when “dilation and evacuation” (D&E) emerged as a safer method. Today D&E is the most common second-trimester procedure. It has been performed millions of times in the United States.

But although D&E is better for the patient, it brings emotional distress for the abortionist, who, after inserting laminaria that cause the cervix to dilate, must dismember and remove the fetus with forceps. One early study, by abortionists Warren Hern and Billie Corrigan, found that although all of their staff members “approved of second trimester abortion in principle,” there “were few positive comments about D&E itself.” Reactions included “shock, dismay, amazement, disgust, fear, and sadness.” A more ambitious study published the following year, in the September 1979 issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, confirmed Hern and Corrigan’s findings. It found “strong emotional reactions during or following the procedures and occasional disquieting dreams.”

Another study, published in the October 1989 issue of Social Science and Medicine noted that abortion providers were pained by encounters with the fetus regardless of how committed they were to abortion rights. It seems that no amount of ideological conviction can inoculate providers against negative emotional reactions to abortion.

Such studies are few. In general, abortion providers have censored their own emotional trauma out of concern to protect abortion rights. In 2008, however, abortionist Lisa Harris endeavored to begin “breaking the silence” in the pages of the journal Reproductive Health Matters. When she herself was 18 weeks pregnant, Dr. Harris performed a D&E abortion on an 18-week-old fetus. Harris felt her own child kick precisely at the moment that she ripped a fetal leg off with her forceps:

Instantly, tears were streaming from my eyes—without me—meaning my conscious brain—even being aware of what was going on. I felt as if my response had come entirely from my body, bypassing my usual cognitive processing completely. A message seemed to travel from my hand and my uterus to my tear ducts. It was an overwhelming feeling—a brutally visceral response—heartfelt and unmediated by my training or my feminist pro-choice politics. It was one of the more raw moments in my life.

Harris concluded her piece by lamenting that the pro-choice movement has left providers to suffer in silence because it has “not owned up to the reality of the fetus, or the reality of fetal parts.” Indeed, it often insists that images used by the pro-life movement are faked.

(Pro-choice advocates also falsely insist that second-trimester abortions are confined almost exclusively to tragic “hard” cases such as fetal malformation. Yet a review of the literature in the April 2009 issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology found that most abortions performed after the first trimester are sought for the same reasons as first-trimester abortions, they’re just delayed. This reality only intensifies the guilt pangs of abortion providers.)

Hern and Harris chose to stay in the abortion business; one of the first doctors to change his allegiance was Paul Jarrett, who quit after only 23 abortions. His turning point came in 1974, when he performed an abortion on a fetus at 14 weeks’ gestation: “As I brought out the rib cage, I looked and saw a tiny, beating heart,” he would recall. “And when I found the head of the baby, I looked squarely in the face of another human being—a human being that I just killed.”

In 1990 Judith Fetrow, an aide at a Planned Parenthood clinic, found that disposing of fetal bodies as medical waste was more than she could bear. Soon after she left her position, Fetrow described her experiences: “No one at Planned Parenthood wanted this job. .  .  . I had to look at the tiny hands and feet. There were times when I wanted to cry.” Finally persuaded to quit by a pro-life protester outside her clinic, Fetrow is now involved in the American Life League.

Kathy Sparks is another convert formerly responsible for disposing of fetal remains, this time at an Illinois abortion clinic. Her account of the experience that led her to exit the abortion industry (taken from the Pro-Life Action League website in 2004) reads in part:

The baby’s bones were far too developed to rip them up with [the doctor’s] curette, so he had to pull the baby out with forceps. He brought out three or four major pieces. .  .  . I took the baby to the clean up room, I set him down and I began weeping uncontrollably. .  .  . I cried and cried. This little face was perfectly formed.

A recovery nurse rebuked Sparks for her unprofessional behavior. She quit the next day. Sparks is now the director of a crisis pregnancy center with more than 20 pro-life volunteers.

Handling fetal remains can be especially difficult in late-term clinics. Until George Tiller was assassinated by a pro-life radical last summer, his clinic in Wichita specialized in third-trimester abortions. To handle the large volume of biological waste Tiller had a crematorium on the premises. One day when hauling a heavy container of fetal waste, Tiller asked his secretary, Luhra Tivis, to assist him. She found the experience devastating. The “most horrible thing,” Tivis later recounted, was that she “could smell those babies burning.” Tivis, a former NOW activist, soon left her secretarial position at the clinic to volunteer for Operation Rescue, a radical pro-life organization.

Other converts were driven into the pro-life movement by advances in ultrasound technology. The most recent example is Abby Johnson, the former director of Dallas-area Planned Parenthood. After watching, via ultrasound, an embryo “crumple” as it was suctioned out of its mother’s womb, Johnson reported a “conversion in my heart.” Likewise, Joan Appleton was the head nurse at a large abortion facility in Falls Church, Virginia, and a NOW activist. Appleton performed thousands of abortions with aplomb until a single ultrasound-assisted abortion rattled her. As Appleton remembers, “I was watching the screen. I saw the baby pull away. I saw the baby open his mouth. .  .  . After the procedure I was shaking, literally.”

The most famous abortion provider to be converted by ultrasound technology, decades ago, is Bernard Nathanson, cofounder of the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws, the original NARAL. In the early 1970s, Nathanson was the largest abortion provider in the Western world. By his own reckoning he performed more than 60,000 abortions, including one on his own child. Nathanson’s exit from the industry was slow and tortured. In Aborting America (1979), he expressed anxiety over the possibility that he was complicit in a great evil. He was especially troubled by ultrasound images. When he finally left his profession for pro-life activism, he produced The Silent Scream (1984), a documentary of an ultrasound abortion that showed the fetus scrambling vainly to escape dismemberment.

This handful of stories is representative of many more. In fact, with the exception of communism, we can think of few other movements from which so many activists have defected to the opposition. Nonetheless, the vast majority of clinic workers remain committed to the pro-choice cause. Perhaps some of those who stay behind are haunted by their work. Most, however, find a way to cope with the dissonance.

Pro-choice advocates like to point out that abortion has existed in all times and places. Yet that observation tends to obscure the radicalism of the present abortion regime in the United States. Until very recently, no one in the history of the world has had the routine job of killing well-developed fetuses quite so up close and personal. It is an experiment that was bound to stir pro-life sentiments even in the hearts of those staunchly devoted to abortion rights.  Ultrasound and D&E bring workers closer to the beings they destroy. Hern and Corrigan concluded their study by noting that D&E leaves “no possibility of denying an act of destruction.” As they wrote, “It is before one’s eyes. The sensations of dismemberment run through the forceps like an electric current.”

*Jon A. Shields is assistant professor of government at Claremont McKenna College. David Daleiden is a student there.

This article is reprinted with permission of The Weekly Standard, where it first appeared on Jan 25 2010, Vol. 15, No. 18. For more information visit www.weeklystandard.com.

Thanks to Lachlan Dunjey who brought this article to our attention. Lachlan is an Australian medical doctor and key member of Choose Life Australia and Medicine With Morality.

Study Finds Posttraumatic Stress Disorder after Abortions

Life Network Australia - Friday, January 15, 2010

From LifeSiteNews

Men and women who felt they had inadequate counseling before an abortion, as well as those who disagreed with their partners about the decision to abort, were more likely to experience personal and interpersonal problems following the procedure, according to a new paper* published in the medical journal Traumatology.

Researchers Catherine T. Coyle, Priscilla K. Coleman, and Vincent M. Rue - all experts in the after-effects of abortion - collected data via online surveys from 374 women who had a prior abortion and 198 men whose partners had experienced elective abortion.  

The results found that women who expressed dissatisfaction with their pre-abortion counseling tended to have relationship problems, such as obsessive intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal - and also tended to describe the full diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  Men with the same pre-abortion experience reported similar interpersonal trauma.

When the individuals reported that their partner disagreed with the decision to abort, women were more likely to report PTSD and intrusion tendencies, while in men such disagreement was linked with PTSD, intrusion, hyperarousal, and other relationship problems. 

The researchers pointed out that few studies have examined men's psychological responses to elective abortion, although the procedure has been commonly linked to subsequent feelings of anger, anxiety, guilt, grief, and powerlessness in men.

"Although men are involved with conception and abortion, they are not routinely offered abortion counseling," they write.  "Despite the call for greater inclusion of and attention to males in abortion clinics, little has changed.  Most men who accompany women for abortion do not receive counseling and are left alone to wait."

* Catherine T. Coyle, Priscilla K. Coleman, and Vincent M. Rue Traumatology first published on November 16, 2009.

Legal Abortion Doesn't Save Women's Lives

Life Network Australia - Saturday, January 02, 2010
Countries With Permissive Abortion Laws Also Have Highest Maternal Death Rates
 
Many abortion advocates have long argued that abortion is necessary to protect the health and safety of women, since many would otherwise seek unsafe abortions. But an analysis of data from a new report published by the World Economic Forum (WEF) has found that countries that permit abortion don't have lower maternal death rates. 
 
The Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-Fam) looked at the data on various countries from the WEF's 2009 Gender Gap Report and found that, countries with the most restrictive abortion laws also had the lowest maternal death rates, while countries with more permissive laws tended to have higher maternal death rates.
 
In Europe, Ireland had the lowest maternal death rate with 1 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births, while Poland was at 27 with 8 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. Both countries have very restrictive laws on abortion, while the U.S., which has "virtually no restrictions on abortion" has 11 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births. 
 
Data from other regions also found that the countries with the most restrictive abortion bans also had the lowest maternal death rates:
 
In Africa, the country with the lowest maternal death rate (15 per 100,000) is Mauritius, which also has the toughest laws against abortion, while Ethiopia, which recently decriminalized abortion, has a rate 48 times higher (720 per 100,000). The African country with the most liberal abortion laws, South Africa, has a maternal death rate of 400 per 100,000 live births.
 
In Asia, Nepal has no restrictions on abortion and also has one of the world's highest mortality rates (830 per 100,000) while Sri Lanka had the lowest rates in Asia (58 per 100,000) and one of the strictest abortion bans in the world.
 
In South America, Chile has constitutional protection for the unborn and a death rate of 16 per 100,000. The highest maternal death rate (430 per 100,000) was found in Guyana, which has almost unrestricted abortion.
 
Ironically, C-Fam says, "one of two main justifications used for liberalizing Guyana's law was to enhance the 'attainment of safe motherhood' by eliminating deaths and complications associated with unsafe abortion."
 
Their findings "show that legal abortion does not mean lower maternal mortality rates," C-Fam concluded.
 
Women Also Have Higher Death Rates After Abortion
 
Other research that has looked at death rates following abortion vs. childbirth have also found that women are more likely to die after an abortion.
 
Studies from Finland that examined women's medical records found that women who had an abortion were six times more likely to die within the following year compared to women who had given birth. Deaths from suicide were 3.5 times higher, deaths from natural causes were 1.6 times higher and deaths from homicide were 14 times higher.
 
And a follow-up study in the U.S., headed by the Elliot Institute, found that, compared to women who gave birth, women who had abortions had a 62 percent higher risk of death for at least eight years later after their pregnancies. Deaths from suicides and accidents were most prominent, with suicides being 2.5 times higher.
 
Other studies have linked abortion to increased physical and psychological problems such as depression, anxiety disorders, infertility problems, sleep disorders, substance abuse and more.
 
~~~
 
Learn more: For more information on the studies mentioned above, download and share the Elliot Institute's Recent Research fact sheet.
 
See this article online.
 
Reproduced with permission.

Top 10 Reasons why Abortion is the 'Unchoice'

Life Network Australia - Sunday, August 16, 2009
From the Elliot Institute ...

A pattern of injustices dressed up as “choice”:

1. The rhetoric of choice hides the reality of coercion.
2. Abortion is often someone else’s “choice.” 64% of American women who have had abortions felt pressured by others.1
3. Pressure is significant. Her “choices” may involve loss of home, family or essential support, or abuse that can escalate to violence.2 Homicide is the leading killer of pregnant women.3
4. Coercion can take many forms, including undisclosed, misleading or false information about foetal development and alternatives.4
5. Even though the majority felt rushed and uncertain, 67% received no counseling; 79% were not told about alternatives.1
6. Abortion is often a woman’s last choice, but her abuser’s first choice.2 Teens face an especially high risk for coercion.5
7. Many who pushed family or friends to abort were also deceived – by experts, authorities or even pastors – about foetal development, alternatives and risks.4, 6
8. The overall death rate of women rises 3.5 times after an abortion.7 Suicide rates are 6 times higher after an abortion.8
9. 65% report symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder they attribute to their abortions.1
10. “We were maiming at least one woman a month.” – Carol Everett, former abortion clinic operator.


It wasn't safe.   It wasn't fair.   It wasn't about choice.
Learn more about abortion's injustice and injury to women: TheUnChoice.com


Citations
1. VM Rue et. al., “Induced abortion and traumatic stress: A preliminary comparison of American and Russian women,” Medical Science Monitor 10(10): SR5-16, 2004.
2. See the special report, Forced Abortion in America at
www.theunchoice.com/Coerced.htm.
3. I.L. Horton and D. Cheng, “Enhanced Surveillance for Pregnancy-Associated Mortality-Maryland, 1993-1998,” JAMA 285(11): 1455-1459 (2001);
J. Mcfarlane et. al., “Abuse During Pregnancy and Femicide: Urgent Implications for Women’s Health,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 100: 27-36 (2002).
4. Melinda Tankard-Reist, Giving Sorrow Words (Springfield, IL: Acorn Books, 2007).
5. Sobie & Reardon, “A Generation at Risk: How Pro-Abortionists Manipulate Vulnerable Teens,” The Post-Abortion Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, Jan-Mar. 2000.
6. Carol Everett with Jack Shaw, Blood Money (Sisters, OR: Multnomah Books, 1992). See also Pamela Zekman and Pamela Warwick, “The Abortion Profiteers,” Chicago Sun Times special reprint, Dec. 3, 1978 (originally published Nov. 12, 1978), p. 2-3, 33.
7. M Gissler et. al., “Pregnancy Associated Deaths in Finland 1987-1994 — definition problems and benefits of record linkage,” Acta Obsetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 76:651-657, 1997. See also, DC Reardon et. al., “Deaths Associated With Pregnancy Outcome: A Record Linkage Study of Low Income Women,” Southern Medical Journal 95(8):834-41, Aug. 2002.
8. M. Gissler et. al., “Injury deaths, suicides and homicides associated with pregnancy, Finland 1987-2000,” European J. Public Health 15(5):459-63, 2005; and M. Gissler, et. al., “Methods for identifying pregnancy-associated deaths: population-based data from Finland 1987-2000,” Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiology 18(6): 44855, Nov. 2004.


Elliot  Institute: AfterAbortion.org    |    Fact Sheets, Outreach: TheUnChoice.com

Unborn babies have memories

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Researchers from the Netherlands have discovered evidence that unborn babies have memories from at least 30 weeks gestation – about two months before they are due to be born.

According to an article in The Washington Times, scientists from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Maastricht University Medical Centre and the University Medical Centre St. Radboud, based their findings on a study of 100 healthy pregnant women and their babies, with the help of some gentle but precise sensory stimulation.

"In addition, results indicated that 34-week-old foetuses are able to store information and retrieve it four weeks later," said the research, which was released earlier this month.

"It seems like every day we find out marvelous new things about the development of unborn children. We hope that this latest information helps people realise more clearly that the unborn are members of the human family with amazing capabilities and capacities like these built in from the moment of conception," said Randall K. O'Bannon, director of education and research for the US National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund.

Related research in 2003 by psychologists and obstetricians at Queen's University in Canada found that the unborn babies in the study preferred the voices of their own mothers - both before and after birth.

For those that have had the privilege of carrying an unborn child or spent time with newborns, especially premature babies, the results come as no surprise. Little babies are just as human as the rest of us. In the womb or out, they deserve our protection.

 

What are the risks associated with abortion?

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
A comprehensive evaluation of over 160 recently published research papers8 on aspects of abortion relating to women’s health and wellbeing revealed a long list of abortion-related physical and psychological risks.

Physical risks:

  • There appear to be more deaths from all causes, including suicide and homicide, after abortion, compared with childbirth.
  • Abortion is associated with a variety of significant physical risks, including premature delivery, infection (which may lead to infertility, particularly in the presence of genital infection), uterine perforation, placenta previa, and possibly miscarriage and low birth weight in future pregnancies.
  • A first pregnancy carried to full term provides a degree of protection against breast cancer. Many studies showed that early abortion of a first pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Other studies show no risk.

Psychological harm:

  • Abortion results in short-term relief for most women, usually accompanied by negative emotions. Such relief tend to be transient.
  • Ten to twenty percent of women suffer from severe negative psychological complications after abortion.
  • Many more women experience emotional distress shortly after an abortion including sadness, loneliness, shame, guilt, grief, doubt and regret.
  • Depression and anxiety are experienced by substantial numbers of women after abortion.
  • Abortion triggers Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in a small proportion of women.
  • After abortion women have an increased risk of psychiatric problems.
  • Women who have experienced abortion have an increased risk of substance abuse and self-harm particularly during a subsequent pregnancy.
  • Abortion for foetal disability is particularly traumatic and can be psychologically damaging for women.
  • Chemical abortion may have additional impacts on women’s psychological wellbeing.

The report also identified factors that put women at increased risk of psychological harm from abortion: for example, a lack of emotional and social support, ambivalence and difficulty making the decision to abort, relationship violence, and a history of psychiatric illness. This report can be purchased through Women’s Forum Australia at www.womensforumaustralia.com

Further information about the afteraffects of abortion can be found at www.afterabortion.org.  

_______________________________________________

8 Ibid.

Why do women have abortions?

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
We at Life Network Australia, believe that the unspoken ‘rules’ about childbirth and motherhood pressure many women to have an abortion. Our society’s attitude towards pregnancies that breach these ‘rules’ can make keeping the baby difficult. Consider the reaction to the following pregnancies:
  • The mother is under 21 or over 40 years old.
  • The mother is in financial difficulty.
  • The mother is a student.
  • The mother already has 3 or more children.
  • The youngest sibling is under 2 years old.
  • The youngest sibling is teenaged or older.
  • The father is not the mother’s current partner.
  • The unborn child has a suspected disability.
According to research 7, the following factors may underlie an abortion decision:
  • A lack of emotional, social and material support.
  • The pregnancy is not necessarily unintended or unwanted.
  • Women may be ambivalent about their pregnancy
  • A substantial number of women undergo abortion while being morally opposed to the practice.
  • Financial concerns are a major motivator.
  • Many women believe that continuing the pregnancy will jeopardise their plans for work and study.
  • Concern about becoming single mothers.
  • Abortion is strongly associated with domestic violence and abuse of women.
  • Relatively few abortions occur for reasons of foetal disability.
_________________________________________________________

7  ‘Women and Abortion – An evidenced based review’, 2005. S Ewing, published by Women’s Forum Australia.

Just a ‘bunch of cells’?

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Information about foetal development can be found at www.justthefacts.org

The following milestones have been documented by scientific research and collated by the Foundation for Human Development. Slight variations may exist and future research using more sensitive methods may show that some of these milestones occur earlier than is now realised.

Within the first hour after conception, the genetic code that establishes the design of a new unique individual is written.

By 24 days, ten days after the mother misses her first menstrual, the heart begins to beat. 

42 days after conception, the foetus is 6-7 mm long. The skeleton is formed in cartilage and the brain coordinates movements of muscles and organs. Reflex responses have begun.

8 weeks after conception (10 weeks pregnant), the baby is well-proportioned and every organ is present. The stomach, liver and kidneys are functioning. Fingerprints are engraved at 10 ½ weeks.

At 12 weeks pregnant, the entire body is sensitive to touch (except the head). Thumb sucking, squinting and swallowing occur. Fingernails are formed.

At 14 weeks pregnant, the baby is 9cm long and undertakes vigorous activity including kicking. Breathing is practiced. 

At 20 weeks the baby is 14 cm long and weighs 200 grams. The baby can swim and turn somersault. The mother can feel her baby’s movements.

By 26 weeks loud noises provoke activity and sleeping habits appear.

By 30 weeks fine baby hair grows on eyebrows, eyelashes and head. Most of the skeleton has hardened. Height is about 23 cm. Babies born at this age have been known to survive.

At 34 weeks eyelids open and close and eyes look around. Mother’s voice can be recognised. Permanent eye teeth are present.

During the final weeks of the pregnancy, weight increases and the baby’s space in the womb begins to get cramped. 

At around 40 weeks, labour is triggered by the baby and birth occurs.

How accessible is an abortion?

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Abortions are available at most public hospitals and at private hospitals and clinics across Australia. These facilities are easily located via the Internet or Yellow pages. Many of the private facilities offer same-day service with no referral necessary and no cooling off period. Women with private health cover can access abortion with no out-of-pocket expenses, and public patients can be bulk-billed.

Is abortion legal?

Life Network Australia - Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Abortion is effectively available on demand in every State up to 20 weeks gestation, later in the ACT and Victoria.

In New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, the Northern Territory and Tasmania, it is a criminal offence to unlawfully supply or administer with the intent to procure a miscarriage. 

In NSW and Queensland, the definition of an unlawful abortion is determined by case law, based largely on the 1969 Menhennitt Ruling in the Victorian Supreme Court. This ruling held that an abortion will be lawful if necessary because there is the risk of serious danger to the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant woman from continuing the pregnancy, not ‘merely the normal dangers of pregnancy and childbirth’. Modern interpretations of this ruling include any kind of mental stress from continuing the pregnancy to be ‘serious danger’.

The South Australian, Western Australian, Northern Territory and Tasmanian legislation sets out provisions for a lawful or ‘legally justified’ abortion. These provisions provide limitations on the gestational age at which the abortion is lawful, and the nature of the necessary danger to the mother.

Abortion has been decriminalised in both the ACT and Victoria. The Victorian legislation allows for abortion on demand up until 24 weeks. It also provides for abortion until full term where two doctors testify that the abortion is appropriate, having regard for the woman’s current and future physical, psychological and social circumstances.

For more information: http://www.saltshakers.org.au/issues/abortion/124-the-law-in-australia